Catuvellauni

The Catuvellauni

Background to the Catuvellauni

Location of the tribe
The Catuvellauni occupied the central part of England, encompassing London, Hertfordshire , Bedfordshire, Buckinghamshire, Cambridgeshire, Oxfordshire, parts of Essex, Northamptonshire.

Background information
The Catuvellauni were something of an enigma in that they were not recorded by Julius Caesar anywhere in his writings on Britain. Yet when Claudius invaded in 43AD , the Catuvellauni were the most dominant tribe in Britain, having taken control by force of much of South East England. But we do know that Cassivellaunus organised the British resistance against Caesar’s second expeditionary force. There reasons for this may have been:

  • The Catuvellauni were known under a different name
  • Caesar may have considered them too small to mention (Considering the area they occupied this is highly unlikely.)
  • Caesar was known for recording events in a manner that turned defeat into victory, and may have tried to play down the role of the Catuvellauni in their defiance of his forces.

This tribe was known for having strong leadership and a well organised structure with an effective fighting force. Which was how they managed to take over the land occupied by the Atrebates, Trinovantes and the Cantium. The reasons for expanding outwards from their own territory were mainly political rather than just a desire to dominate surrounding areas.

  • The Catuvellauni were very much an inland tribe and wanted to take advantage of the new found wealth that came with European trade.
  • The tribe wanted to have control over the tribes most likely to threaten their superiority of central England.
  • Supplies of goods and produce had to transported through hostile territory.
  • The wanted to have more access to the coastal regions of Britain, thereby enabling them to defend their territory more effectively.

Some of the writings about the Catuvellauni

Caesar
‘by common consent they had entrusted the supreme command and conduct of the campaign to Cassivellaunus, whose territories are divided from the maritime states by the river called Tamesis², about eighty miles from the sea.’

Caesar
‘”Having obtained knowledge of their plans, Caesar led his army into the borders of Cassivellaunus as far as the River Thames, which can be crossed at one place¹ only on foot, and that with difficulty. ..’

Caesar
‘When the Trinovantes had been placed under protection and secured from all outrage at the hands of the troops, the Cenimagni, the Segontiaci, the Ancalites, the Bibroci and the Cassi sent deputations and surrendered to Caesar. …’

It is interesting to note that Caesar does not actually mention the Catuvellauni, just their leader Cassivellaunus.

Principal towns and settlements in Catuvellauni territory

Verulamium – (St. Albans, Hertfordshire). The third largest town in Britain under the Romans. Destroyed during the Boudiccan rebellion. In 50AD, became a municipium, which granted Roman rights to the occupants

Wheathamstead – (Hertfordshire) – Situated just north of St. Alban’s, is reputed to be the site of the decisive defeat of Cassivellaunus by Julius Caesar in 54BC.

The Aubreys – (nr. Redbourn, Hertfordshire) – Posting Station and Settlement

Ravensburgh (Bedfordshire) – Posting Station and Settlement

Sulloniacis – (Brockley Hill, Greater London) – A settlement which was the centre of an important pottery industry.

Durocobrms – (Dunstable, Bedfordshire) – Minor settlement where Watling Street crossed the Icknield Way.

Magiovinium – (Dropshort, Buckinghamshire) – A Major settlement and road station at the crossing of the Ouzel.

Lactodurum – (Towcester, Northamptonshire) – A small town.

Bannaventa.- (Whilton Lodge, Northamptonshire) – A 4th century fortified town.

Durobrivae – (Water Newton, Cambridgeshire) – Town beside the river Nene succeeded an early fort. Centre of the flourishing Castor potteries, and surrounded by a number of rich villas.

Durovigutum – (Godmanchester, Cambridgeshire) – Small walled town and road centre mentioned in the Ravenna Cosmography.

Duroliponte – (Cambridge, Cambridgeshire) – Listed the Antonine Itinerary.

Other settlements listed under the current day name

Alchester – (Oxfordshire) – Walled town, replaced early Roman Fort.

Baldock – (Hertfordshire) – Posting station on Ermine Street.

Billericay – (Essex) – Small settlement.

Bishops Stortford – (Hertfordshire) – posting station on the Camulodunum – Braughing road.

Blacklands – (nr. King’s Sutton, Northamptonshire) – Settlement of uncertain character north of Alchester.

Braintree – (Essex) – posting station on the Camulodunum – Braughing road.

Braughing – (Hertfordshire) – Posting station and major settlement at the focus of several roads.

Duston – (Northamptonshire) – Metal-working centre near Northampton.

Dorchester-on-Thames (Oxfordshire) – Walled town, replacing an earlier native settlement.

Fleet Marston – (Buckinghamshire) – Intermediate posting station on Akeman Street west of Aylesbury, between Alcester and Verulamion.

Great Chesterford – (Essex) – Walled town, succeeding an early military site.

Great Dunmow – (Essex) – posting station on the Camulodunum – Braughing road.

Horseheath – (Cambridgeshire) – Small settlement.

Irchester – (Northamptonshire) – Walled town.

Kettering – (Northamptonshire) – An iron-working settlement of some importance.

Little London – (Chigwell, Essex) – posting station on the Londinium – Great Dunmow road.

Prittlewell – (Essex) – Small settlement.

Sandy – (Bedfordshire) – Ermine Street posting station.

Sawtry – (Cambridgeshire) – minor settlement.

Welwyn – (Hertfordshire) – Small settlement.

Wimpole Lodge – (Cambridgeshire) – Posting station.

Woodeaton – (Oxfordshire) – Shrine and a rural market .

Some of the Catuvellauni kings and queens

Cassivellaunus The main opponent of Caesar in both of his expeditions. Cassivellaunus may have formed the tribe known as the Catuvellauni from a group of smaller tribes of Belgian origin living north of the Thames. The next identifiable ruler of the Catuvellauni was Tasciovanus who took the throne around 20BC, though whether he was the son or grandson of Cassivellaunus is unknown. Cassivellaunus may mean ‘Vellaunus of the Cassi’, when translated (His tribe was the Cassi and his name was Vellaunus.) The name given to the newly unified tribe gathered under his command could mean ‘the Followers, or Smiters, of Vellaunus’.

Andocomius This ruler succeeded when Cassivellaunus died around 30BC, and it is suspected he married a daughter of Mandubracius of the Trinovantes of Essex. This would have made a bond between these two tribes that would enable them to coexist in relative peace. He died about 20BC leaving the Catuvellaunian tribe in the hands of his son Tasciovanus.

Tasciovanus The grandson of Cassivellaunus, and the father of Cunobelin and Epaticcus. He was ruler of the tribe from 20BC, and the first Catuvellaunian king to issue inscribed coins, bearing the VER(ulamium) mint marks. He was also the first to turn against the Trinovantes, ending the long-established treaty between Caesar and his own grandfather Cassivellaunus. Between 10 and 15BC he issued a coins bearing the mint mark CAMU(lodunum). This would indicate that he had either taken the Trinovantes by force, or was claiming the territory for his own. Whether or not he actually ruler the Trinovantes is unclear. He was succeeded by his brilliant son Cunobelin AD10.

Andoco Known only from inscriptions on coins, where his name appears as ANDO or ANDOCO, and on one issue as TAS ANDO in which it is assumed that his name appears with that of his overlord, Tasciovanus. The distribution of these coins suggest that Andocos or Andocoveros ruled over a territory on the western area of the Catuvellauni, and was issuing coin towards the end of the reign of Tasciovanus around 15BC-AD10) at the turn of the first century AD.

Cunobelin Son of Tasciovanus, father of Adminius, Togodumnus and Caratacus. During the last years of his father’s reign, he invaded the territory of the Trinovantes and overwhelmed them. He continued to rule over the Trinovantes from Camulodunum and reigned over both the Catuvellaunian and Trinovantian people by about 10AD

He became ‘the first British statesman’ and through diplomatic means, probably held the thrones of both regions , for some of his later coinage bears the title “REX”. He continued to rule the combined tribes from Camulodunum for many years, and Camulodunum became the focal point of British politics, learning and trade. Suddenly, in about 40AD, he is believed to have suffered a stroke. Subsequent military actions by his sons Togodumnus and Caratacus, swept throughout south-east Britain deposing first their own brother Adminius from Cantium, then their old adversary Verica of the Atrebates. Cunobelin died shortly before the Roman invasion.

Epaticcus A son of Tasciovanus, maybe the younger brother of Cunobelin. It is believed he moved further into Atrebatian territory and deposed king Verica, and installed himself at his capital, Calleva circa 25AD. He continued to take Verica’s lands to west and south until his death, probably on campaign in 35AD, after which his desire to conquer surrounding lands was continued by his nephews Caratacus and Togodumnus in the late 30’s AD.

Adminius A son of Cunobelin, therefore to Togodumnus and Caratacus. He appears to have been given authority over the Cantium towards the end of the reign of Tiberius around 35AD, replacing the old chief Vodenos who may have died. Adminius was driven from Cantium by his two brothers, apparently with the approval of his father at around 40AD. This was presumably because of his leanings towards the Romans, which had resulted from his governing that part of Britain closest to Gaul and so influenced by the Romans across the channel.. He probably had the idea the Romans would invade Britain, and so intended to ensure he kept his position in British society.

He escaped capture and fled to Gaul, moving on to Germany in 41AD. He sought the support of Gaius Caligula and tried to persuade the emperor that Britain was ready to be taken at this time. The attempt of Gaius failed dismally, and Adminius no doubt accompanied the emperor back to Rome where he was subsequently returned to Britain by the emperor Claudius in 43AD, just before the invasion. It is possible that he was installed as the nominal governor of Cantium for his services, and possibly lived in the Villa discovered at Eccles near the crossing of the North Downs Way and the river Medway. Here he most likely spent the remainder of his life.

Togodumnus A son of Cunobelin, and brother to both Caratacus and Adminius. While his father ruled the joint Catuvellaunian/Trinovantian kingdom from Camulodunum, and his brother Adminius governed Cantium from Durovernum. Togodumnus was given administrative authority over the Catuvellaunian tribe and based himself at the old capital of Verulamium around 35AD, following the death of his uncle Epaticcus who had previously secured the western borders of the kingdom by his occupation of the Atrebates capital, Calleva.

When Cunobelin was incapacitated by illness in 40AD, Togodumnus supported the expulsion of Adminius from Cantium by his younger brother Caratacus. Following his fathers death around 42AD and his subsequent taking of the throne, he empowered Caratacus to resume the war against the Atrebates, who eventually forced Verica to flee to the continent. He fought at least two major battles against Aulus Plautius in 43AD and was either killed during the battle of the Medway, or died from his wounds shortly afterwards.

Caratacus Probably the youngest son of Cunobelin, and brother to Adminius and Togodumnus. It is quite possible that he accompanied Epaticcus, his uncle, during his campaigns against Verica of the Atrebates from 25AD until his death about 35AD. Following the death of his father in 40AD, he took the throne from his elder brother Adminius. He then joined forces with his other brother Togodumnus in 41AD to carry on the campaign against the Atrebates.. He fought several battles against Plautius during the invasion of 43AD before retreating to Wales, where he incited the Silures and Ordovices to rise up against the Romans.

During the change in Roman administration in 47AD, Caratacus led the Silures in a well-timed attack deep into Gloucestershire. The new governor, Ostorius Scapula, spent almost the whole of his term of office fighting against Caratacus, finally beating him in a final battle in mid-Wales in 50AD. Caratacus fled to the Brigantes in an attempt to find sanctuary and seek support from Queen Cartimandua.

This was a foolhardy move as Cartimandua had already agreed a pact of non aggression with the Romans. This gave the Brigantes the perfect opportunity to show their loyalty to their Roman masters. He was held prisoner, then handed over to Scapula. He was sent in 51AD under guard to the emperor for punishment. Caratacus was a shrewd man who knew how to manipulate people, and although he had not managed to influence Queen Cartimandua, he so impressed the Senate with his defiant speech that he was allowed to live with his family in Rome.

Cantii

The Cantium

Background to the Cantium

Location of the tribe
Far South East of England, Kent and a smail part of Sussex

Background information
Julius Caesar noted in his writings that this part of Britain was occupied by what he considered to be the most civilised tribe in Britain.

Mostly this attributed to the fact that being the furthest south and east, therefore closest to the continent, they were the tribe most influenced by European ways and innovation, due to their extensive trade with Gaul.

Some of the writings about the Cantium

Caesar
The natural shape of the island (Britain) is triangular, and one side lies opposite to Gaul. Of this side one angle, which is in Cantium (where almost all the ships from Gaul come in to land), faces the east, the lower angle faces south.’

Caesar
‘Of all the Britons the inhabitants of Cantium, an entirely maritime district, are by far the most civilised, differing but little from the Gallic manner of life.’And provides us with further snippets on the political

Caesar
‘Cassivellaunus¹ sent messages to Cantium, a country by the sea, as above set forth, over whose four districts Cingetorix, Carvilius, Taximagulus, and Segovax ruled as kings, and commanded them to collect all their forces for a sudden attempt and assault upon the naval camp.’

Principal towns and settlements in Cantium territory

Durovernum Cantiacorum – (Canterbury, Kent) – Pre-Roman settlement, later Civitas capital served by a port three miles down the Stour at Fordwich.

Pre-Roman Settlements
Durobrivae – (Rochester, Kent) – Pre-Roman native settlement on the Medway. One of only two walled towns in Cantium territory. The other being Canterbury.
Durolitum? – (Ospringe, Kent)
Hastings (Sussex) – This iron port had overland connections with Kent rather than Sussex.
Loose – (near to Maidstone, Kent) – Pre-Roman native settlement on the upper Medway.
Maidstone (Kent) – A Roman settlement of some kind is suspected.
Noviomagus Cantiacorum
-(Crayford, Greater London) – Posting Station on Watling Street
Portus Dubris – (Dover, Kent) – Coastal Station
Portus Lemanis – (Lympne, Kent) – Coastal Station
Rutupiae – (Richborough, Kent) – The main port of entrance to Britain.
Titsey (Kent) – Rural temple may mark the western border of the Canton.
Vagniacis
or Vagniacae – (Springhead, Kent) – Posting Station on Watling Street

Some of the Cantium kings and queens

Dubnovellaunus Perhaps one of several kings of the Cantium in the latter half of the first century BC. He could well have been the second British king mentioned in the Augustan record, but it is not likely.

Cunobelin The coins of Cunobelin of the Catuvellauni appeared throughout Cantium territory during the early part of the first century AD. It is widely beleived that the Catuvellauni became extremely powerful sometime between the second expedition of Caesar and the Roman invasion. There is much evidence to suggest that the Cantium tribe were overrun by the Catuvellauni, as were the Atrebates and the Trinovantes.

Adminius Adminius was probably the eldest son of Cunobelin, who was given the administration of Cantium by his father around 30AD

Holy Places of the Brigantes

Yorkshire’s Holy Wells &

the Severed Head – Holy places of the Brigantes?

by Edna Whelan

The cult of the severed head is important in Celtic tradition; and most of Yorkshire was once occupied by the Celtic tribe of the Brigantes, a confederacy of Celtic tribes subservient to an overruling royal dynasty. The reign of their queen Cartimandua was contemporaneous with that of Boadicea. The land which they occupied stretched from the River Calder northwards to the Tyne and extended from the east to the west coasts, and therefore they were a force to be reckoned with when the Roman cohorts headed north. Their nine large towns or settlements were noted by Ptolemy in the first century AD and included Catterick, Aldborough, Ilkley and York.

It seems strange therefore that amongst the two hundred or so holy wells in Yorkshire there are only three or four which have stone heads incorporated in their decorative structure, whilst Celtic or Celtic-style stone heads abound on buildings, walls and bridges all over the county.

   The holy wells which are definitely associated with heads are, however, each very special. The only listed holy well in our broad acres, to my knowledge, is situated at Eshton in Wharfedale, not far from the town of Skipton; and this is named St Helen’s Well as are many of our wells in the north. We like to claim St Helen as being of Brigantine royal lineage as she was the wife of Constantius the First, who died at York, and the mother of Constantine the Great who was first proclaimed Emperor there [Turner, (1888); p. 200]. She is, rightly or wrongly, enshrined in our part of the world as a Yorkshire lass. St Helen, as a Brigantine princess, would also be related to Coel Hen Godebog, a post- Roman overlord of North Britain, who is now also known as Old King Cole [Phillips, (1976); p. 50].

The holy well at Eshton is of a unique design, having a slightly semicircular stone curb which retains the water at a certain level until it finds its way around and under the confining bounds. At either end of the curb are two deeply-carved square stones of strange design; and spaced along the waterside edge at intervals, are what seem to be three round stones with slight hollows in the top.

If, however, you kneel down on the curb and feel with your hands under the water beneath the three stones, you become pleasantly aware of a secret.

They are really the crowns of three stone heads, and it is possible to recognise by the sense of touch the eyes, nose and mouth of the faces which are submerged beneath the water.

The only person I knew who ever acquired a clear view of the heads was an archaeologist named Lionel Atkinson, who lived in the next village; and he told me that in a year of long drought the water level at the well was much lower than usual, and it was possible actually to see and examine the faces. He was of the opinion that they were not Celtic but of a much later date, as the features were more pronounced; and he thought that they might have been removed, in times long past from some religious establishment.

The water here was said to possess healing properties for eye diseases and a number of smaller ailments, and the custom was to mix the water of the well with sugar before drinking it. It is also mentioned in a commission relating to the Manor of Flasby in 1429 that there was a chapel-of-ease dedicated to St Helen standing beside the well.

The next holy well which features a stone head is situated on a forest ride three-quarters of the way up the wooded slopes of Witton Fell at the foot of Wensleydale. The track which leads to the well is called Castaway Ride and there is reference to;

‘a beautiful spring designated Cast-a-way Well, almost on the summit of the fell…There is another spring on the fell called Diana’s Well…This fountain is considered so pure that a very old rhyme is still current:

“Whoever eats Hammer nuts, and drinks Diana’s water [pronounced watter],

Will never leave Witton Town while he’s a rag or tatter”.

The nearby Hammer Woods contain excellent hazel nuts and the Witton people are proverbial for their attachment to the place.’

[Hope, (1893); p. 196; Whellan, (1859); p. 450].

   Diana’s Well is marked on the Ordnance Survey map, and is relatively easy to find as it is sited beside the track a good mile and a half into the forest; but I have walked quite a few miles through the woods on this hillside and I have never come across any sign of Cast-a-Way Well.

As its name seems to infer, Diana’s Well has retained its Roman connection and has so escaped Christianisation.

The water of the well emerges from the mouth of a stone head which is set into a high wall made up of large slabs of stone; and this wall, in holding back the soil of the hillside, also forms one side of a grotto.

The features of the head resemble the Celtic style of carving, but at some time the face was split down the centre, maybe when the lead pipe which carries the water was set into the mouth. This damage so distorts the face that it is difficult to recognise the nose, but the eyes are clearer; and the ears on the sides of the head are plain to see.

As the water flows from the mouth it falls a few inches into a small stone trough and then spills over to the ground, where it runs away across the forest track and into the undergrowth.

All around and below the sides of the trough grow luscious ferns and tall grasses, and the well is sited so deep within the forest that no-one seems to be around the place except the birds, and the small wild creatures, and a million or two insects.

The stone head itself is said to be a gargoyle taken from the nearby Jerveaulx Abbey, and the only wisp of a legend is the remaining rhyme, as quoted above.

The local people in their wry humour have given the well another name: that of ‘Slavering Sall’!

   My third holy well is a famous one, and is sited on the lower edge of Ilkley Moor above the ancient town of Ilkley. Its name is simply White Wells, the plural being represented by two bath houses into which the water which springs from the hillside has been piped. The plunge baths, one for men and the other for women, were built in 1760 by a certain Squire Middleton; but a reference to the wells contained in a letter written in 1709 by Dr Richardson of Bierley states that ‘Ilkley is chiefly famous for a cold well which has done very remarkable cures in scrofulous cases by bathing and drinking it’.

Only one of the baths is now accessible. This is quite large and is lined with stone tiles, and a shallow flight of steps leads down into the water. Set into the side wall of the bath is a stone head, and the water runs into the bath through its open mouth. The style of the head is definitely Celtic but it was made specifically for the baths when they were built.

The other bath is hidden beneath the floor of the house which is now used as living quarters for the custodians of the wells. I have been told by Mr Gavin Edwards, the archaeologist at Manor House Museum in Ilkley that the stone head was originally placed beside this bath.

There are two legends surrounding this well. The first one states that some time in the 1700s, a shepherd boy gashed his leg on a rock on the moor and, after bathing it in the water of the well, his wound was miraculously healed within a few days.

The second story is of a day in 1820 before the bath houses were roofed over, when the attendant at White Wells, one William Butterfield, arriving early to open up the doors, found that the key turned round and round in the lock and seemed to melt. On managing to force the door open he found to his astonishment a group of fairies frolicking by the water. They were tiny figures dressed in green and they disappeared over the wall and into the heather when he surprised them [Smith, (1878); Bord & Bord, (1985); p. 113]. There is no Christian saint associated with the well. The lady who used to look after it once told me that sometimes, when she visited the bath house early in the morning or late in the evening, she could hear a strange rhythmic sighing sound above the noise of the water, which seemed to come from the ground beneath.

The moors above Ilkley are famous for their large number of prehistoric remains, including stone circles, cup-marked stones and cairns, and also the singular Swastika Stone.

Although these three particular holy wells have heads enclosed within their framework none of them have legends of the severed heads of saints associated with them as in other parts of the country. This must have a logical explanation which at the moment eludes me.

There is another holy well sited on the outskirts of Hebden Bridge in West Yorkshire, which is named Green Springs, and which had two stone heads set into the wall just above the trough which contains the spring water. These Celtic-style archaic heads are no longer there because of modern disrespect for our ancient heritage. One weekend some thief stole one of the heads, to the horror and dismay of local historians, and therefore the second head was removed and taken away to a safe place.

This story was reported in the local paper and found its way into the Northern Earth magazine; but I cannot give a further description of the well itself as I have never – as yet – visited it. Nor do I know anything of its history. However, the association of the heads must give it some importance.

Another water source, in the woods near Adel on the edge of the suburbs of Leeds, is called the ‘Slavering Baby’. Here at one time the water emerged, once more, from the mouth of a stone head, but now the water trickles from the side of the stonework. There was once a tea house here, but as there are no other references or records attached to the place I hesitate to list it as a holy well and think it is merely a Victorian drinking fountain. I could be proved wrong.

References

 

Bord, Janet & Colin, (1985); Sacred Waters, London: Granada.

Hope R.C., (1893); The Legendary Lore of the Holy Wells of England, London: Elliot Stock.

Phillips, Guy Ragland, (1976); Brigantia, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

Smith, Charles C., (1878); ‘Fairies at Ilkley Wells’, in Folk-Lore Record 1, pp. 229-31.

Turner, J. Horsfall, (Ed.), (1888); Yorkshire Folklore Journal 1.

Whellan, T., (1859); The History and Topography of the City of York and the North Riding of Yorkshire. Beverley: Author.

 

Brigantes in Arthurian Legend

Brigantia, Cartimandua and Gwenhwyfar

by

Michelle Ziegler,

Belleville, Illinois

The name Brigantia represents three separate concepts: a goddess, a people, and a tribal federation. By the Roman period, the name represented a tribal federation compromising all of what would become the Roman province of Britannia Secunda, except for the Parisi territory, east of the River Derwent. According to Ptolemy, Brigantian territory stretched from sea to sea, making its people the most numerous in Britain (Higham 1987:9). Initially, the entire Brigantian federation entered into the empire as a single civitas, whose capital was at Isurium Brigantium, modern Aldborough.

During the post-Roman period, the province of Britannia Secunda reverted to a state more reminiscent of its pre-Roman tribal society. The civitas of the Parisi quickly became the kingdom of Deira (Dumville 1989). Rheged appears to have been formed from the civitas of the Carvetii (Dark 1994:71-72). The Civitas Brigantium became divided into the regions or kingdoms of Elmet, Craven, and perhaps Brigantia, located on an axis from York to Catterick, plus probably others whose names have not survived. Aldborough/Isurium Brigantia was occupied in the fifth century but the civitas capital of the Brigantes would likely have been relocated to Eboracum (York; Dark 1994:72-74).

The term Brigantia and the concept of the goddess Brigantia survived into the post-Roman period. John Koch has tentatively translated two stanzas of the poem Y Gododdin to read “as [?] Brigantia rose, ascending towards the sky” (A.58) and “the man who [?]went down into [?] Brigantia was slain on a spear shaft” (A.71) (Koch 1997:107, 113). Catterick, the site of the main action in Y Gododdin, was deep in pre-Roman Brigantian territory.

All of the known post-Roman northern leaders located within the former territory of the Brigantian federation are found within the dynasty of Coel Hen the Protector.4 This creation of this super-dynasty may indicate that regions as far separate as Rheged in Cumbria and Elmet in south-eastern Brigantia were linked together in some sort of political union. This union could have taken several forms, from an actual federation with a supreme king to an alliance of tribes with a dominant king or alternatively, a succession of dominant kings exerting hegemony over the other kingdoms of the former province of Britannia Secunda. If the dynasty of Coel Hen can be seen to have been used by later scribes as a justification or rationalization for the reformation of the Brigantia polity, the localization of the Coeling dynasts suggests Brigantian territory extended beyond its limits under the Romans to include the Gododdin and part of Galloway.

Although fourth century Roman forts were abandoned all over Britain, Kenneth Dark observed “that out of at most 16 sites with later 5th-6th century evidence no fewer than 14 had probably been under the command of the Dux Britanniarum at the end of the 4th century” (Dark 1998). Not only were these sites reoccupied, they were refortified and Saxon mercenaries may have been recruited to man them, as mentioned in the Historia Brittonum (Dark 1992). The high status of these sites is illustrated by the British halls found in Birdoswald fortress (Dark 1992) and the fifth century Christian church found in the fortress of Vindolanda (Wilkinson 1998). Further occupation has been found at the two towns closest to the Wall, Carlisle and Corbridge, plus the other Brigantian towns of Catterick, Aldborough, York and Malton (Dark 1992). Placenames and Welsh tradition further specifically associate the Coelings with the Mote of Liddel, Papcastle (Derventio), and Catterick (Miller 1975). All of these sites are believed to be located within pre-Roman Brigantian territory.

In the fifth and sixth centuries, which have been called the Age of Arthur, the tribes of Greater Brigantia were indeed on their way to becoming a major power again. The combination of extensive fortification of the abandoned Roman sites and a dynasty that includes rulers located throughout the former Brigantian territory suggests that either the federation actually or functionally became reformed by alliance and/or hegemony. With the rebirth of Greater Brigantian independence, the pre-Roman past would have been recalled with pride and sorrow.

The Fall of Brigantia

When the Romans arrived in the first century, they found the vast Brigantian tribal federation in the neck of Britain organized under Queen Cartimandua (c. 43 to c. 70 AD), whose seat was at the massive fortification of Stanwick. Cartimandua’s husband was acknowledged as king, assuming the role as the Brigantian warlord. The Roman historian Tacitus (Annals 12.40, 2-7; Histories 3.45; Koch 1995:39-40) specifically acknowledges that it was Cartimandua, the living symbol of Brigantia, who held the ultimate power among the Brigantes and had an active role in choosing her husband/warlord. Indeed, it has been suggested that the Welsh word for king, brenin, is derived from brigantinos meaning the consort of Brigantia (Koch 1995:39). The Romans must have been pleased when they found that Cartimandua favored establishing formal contacts and alliances with them. Although firm evidence is lacking, it is believed that Brigantia became a Roman client kingdom as early as the 40’s AD (Hanson and Campbell 1986:73).

Initially, Brigantia prospered as a client state and grew wealthy. In 51 AD, Caratacus son of Cunobelinus, the leader of Celtic resistance to the Romans in the south, was captured and brought before Cartimandua, who promptly turned him over to the Romans. Tacitus (3.45; Koch 1995:40) credited Cartimandua’s capture of Caratacus as “having secured the most important component of Emperor Claudius’s triumph”.

In c. 69 AD, Cartimandua divorced her husband Venutius and took as her husband another warrior named Vellocatus (“better in battle”), Venutius’s former armor bearer. However this was no simple divorce for, by this action, her new husband became king. Tacitus (3.45; Koch 1995:39-40) recorded that the divorce and remarriage prompted a civil war among the Brigantes because the majority of the people preferred Venutius as king. Yet, Cartimandua’s will prevailed, “favoring the illegitimate husband [Vellocatus] were the queen’s libido and her ferocious temper” (Tacitus 3.45; Koch 1995:40).

Venutius, who had previously fought for the Romans, turned to the anti-Roman faction among the Brigantes for support and ignited a civil war. The war continued for some time among the Brigantes until Venutius was on the eve of victory. With Cartimandua in a compromised position, the Romans intervened to save their ally (Salway 1993:92). Roman intervention saved Cartimandua but in the end her actions gave the Romans an excuse to conquer Brigantia. The Romans could not tolerate the long Brigantian border in the hands of a hostile king who could not only attack the south himself but also harbor Roman enemies from the south (Salway 1993:92). To the Brigantians, the fault for their conquest by the Romans would have fallen squarely on the shoulders of Cartimandua and the war between her husbands . . . and would not have been forgotten.

Cartimandua was capable of such behavior because she was a living representative of the goddess of sovereignty, Brigantia (Koch 1995:39-40; Ross 1996:354-355). According to Anne Ross, “Cartimandua’s powerful role in Roman times may suggest that society recognized the power of the goddess by mirroring her authority in its own temporal ruler. . . . This particular goddess may have been as much concerned with the actual tribal hegemony as with the territory” (Ross 1996:456). According to Patrick Ford, horses were intimately associated with goddesses of sovereignty (Ford 1977: 8-10). It is possible that Cartimandua inherited this role since her name literally means “sleek pony” (Ross 1996:449).

Brigantia was a goddess who manifested herself under three forms. If we can take her later manifestation in Ireland as a guide, Cormac’s Glossary tells us Brigantia represented first and foremost sovereignty, with her other two aspects representing healing and metal working (Byrne 1973; Ross 1996:456). Anne Ross further identifies Brigantia as a patroness of pastoral peoples in Ireland and Britain. The advent of Christianity did not abolish the role of Brigantia as a symbol of sovereignty. According to John Koch, “a further survival of this idea is seen in the fragmentary elegy to the 7th century Welsh king Cadwallon in which the River Braint (<*Briganti) is described as overflowing in grief for its fallen consort”.

Cartimandua and Gwenhwyfar

The similarity between the activity of Cartimandua and the fate of Brigantia in the first century with Arthur’s Queen Gwenhwyfar (Guinevere) and the fall of Arthur’s realm in Geoffrey’s History of the Kings of Britain is striking. The case of Cartimandua takes a mythical possibility for the activities of the personification of Brigantia into the realm of historical fact. Like Cartimandua, Gwenhwyfar is said to have replaced her husband Arthur with his trusted commander Medraut (Modred). According to Geoffrey of Monmouth, Medraut (Modred) recruited foreign troops from the Saxons; similarly, Cartimandua recruited help from the Romans. The result in both cases is a ferocious civil war that leads to the destruction of the kingdom and eventual domination by an outside force. Both parties also recruited foreigners; the Romans in the first century and the Angles in the fifth- to seventh-centuries in the north. Exactly ten years after Arthur’s death at Camlann in the Annales Cambriae, Ida founds Anglian Bernicia, the original Anglian kingdom that grew into Northumbria. However, Arthur’s fall may not originally have been considered a key event in the Anglian domination of Britain.16 In both cases, the queen herself survives unharmed; Gwenhwyfar fled to a convent and Cartimandua was rescued by her Romans allies.

Both Gwenhwyfar and Cartimandua would have sought refuge in the current capital of Brigantia in the eras in which the two stories are set. Cartimandua is likely to have fortified herself at Stanwick, the pre-Roman Brigantian capital. We might imagine that Cartimandua fell back on her religious role for protection. According to Geoffrey, Gwenhwyfar and Medraut were living together in York when Arthur arrived to challenge them. From York, Gwenhwyfar flees to the church of Julius the Martyr. Geoffrey located this church in Caerleon but, in an article within this issue, P.J.C. Field identifies York as the original site of the Church of Julius the Martyr. To Peter Korrel, Gwenhwyfar’s flight to a convent is an indication that she had been a willing partner of Medraut (Korrel 1984:121-122). Gwenhwyfar is not a victim seeking reunification with her first husband but Medraut’s accomplice.

Nothing is known about the final battle between Venutius and Vellocatus or the Romans, so it cannot be compared with Camlann other than for the likelihood that both battles occurred within Brigantian territory. The leading contender for the site of Camlann is Camboglanna on Hadrian’s Wall and, also therefore, within the former Brigantian territory. After the Roman rescue of Cartimandua, Venutius is not heard from again and the Roman conquest of Brigantia begins.

We know that the tales of Gwenhwyfar and Medraut existed prior to the writing of Geoffrey’s History: Indeed the entire adultery scenario set out by Geoffrey of Monmouth seems to have been common knowledge. Geoffrey (Thorpe 1966: 257-258) “prefers to say nothing” of it. Furthermore, Geoffrey tells us his version of Camlann and, probably, the affair of Gwenhwyfar came from “the British treatise already referred to” that he claims was also known by Walter of Oxford (Thorpe 1966:258). This could all be chalked up to Geoffrey covering his tracks, except that the evidence of the Modena Archivolt stands as testimony to the existence of the association of Gwenhwyfar and Medraut prior to Geoffrey’s writing. Modern dates for the archivolt are c. 1120-1140 (Lacy 1996:325), which is contemporary with Geoffrey of Monmouth. The scene depicted on the archivolt is obscure and probably does not represent any one tale currently known. It shows Medraut (Mardoc) and Gwenhwyfar (Winlogee) in a wooden fortress being besieged by Arthur (Artus de Bretania) and some of his knights, including Gawain (Galvagin), but excluding Lancelot (Lacy 1996:325).

Although approximately 400 years separates Cartimandua’s fate and the traditional date of Gwenhwyfar’s origin, John Koch has argued that Roman conquest era history survived in Brittonic oral history fairly intact through the medieval period. Peter Korrel also sees Welsh sources such as the Historia Brittonum and the Welsh oral tales as the basis for Geoffrey’s Arthur. He believes that the Arthurian romances owe little or nothing to Geoffrey (Korrel 1984:116-117).

Gwenhwyfar has other similarities with Brigantia as a goddess of sovereignty. The name Gwenhwyfar means “white sprite or phantom,” a reference to the otherworld (Ford 1983). It has also been recognized that the name Gwenhwyfar corresponds to the Irish Findabair, the name of Queen Medb’s daughter (Bromwich and Evans 1992:66). She also appears in triplicate in the triad of Arthur’s three queens (Bromwich 1978; Coe and Young 1995:85). Gwenhwyfar is listed along with Arthur’s otherworld weapons as boons that Culhwch could not request in Culhwch and Olwen, suggesting that she comes from the otherworld also (Ford 1983:272) and reinforcing her role in Arthur’s sovereignty. According to Patrick Sims-Williams, in Welsh the “termination of -ach evokes unpleasantness” (Sims-Williams 1991:42). Therefore, Gwenhwyfar’s sister Gwenhwyfach, found in the Welsh triads (Bromwich 1978) and Culhwch and Olwen (Ford 1977:131), may represent an unpleasant or evil form of Gwenhwyfar herself.

Korrel evaluated three types of abduction stories as described by Cross and Nitze in relation to Gwenhwyfar’s abduction by Melwas and her affair with Medraut (Korrel 1984:91). Type I involves a wife-stealing raid, marriage by conquest as illustrated in the beginning of Culhwch and Olwen. In Type II, the abductor is a supernatural being who steals a mortal woman and takes her to his realm. Type III involves an otherworld abductor who reclaims his otherworld lover from her mortal mate. Korrel believes Gwenhwyfar’s relationship with Medraut is a Type I abduction and her abduction by Melwas is intended to be Type II.

In the Type I abduction, a real transfer of power occurs. The new husband claims not only his new wife but also her first husband’s lands. This appears to be exactly what Medraut does to Arthur, except that Gwenhwyfar, like Cartimandua, plays an active role in the transfer of power. The very fact that in Geoffrey’s version Arthur leaves Gwenhwyfar as a co-ruler of Britain in his absence further supports the notion that she is a sovereignty figure for the land. Note that in Culhwch and Olwen, Cilydd bears no shame for the manner by which he obtained his wife nor does his wife appear to hold it against him, bemoaning only that he has no children. Obtaining a wife by this manner was an expected ambition and therefore there was no need for guilt. The role of the wife in sovereignty/ownership of the land was very real in these wife-stealing tales for chieftains like Cilydd as well as kings.

In Triad 80, The Three Faithless Wives of the Island of Britain, Gwenhwyfar is listed as the fourth and most faithless of all. This triad illustrates that Gwenhwyfar was not viewed as a helpless victim. Being the fourth listed, she was probably a late addition to the triad. Korrel (1984:78) suggests her faithlessness may be modeled on Essyllt’s (who is also listed in the same triad) but this assumption is unnecessary. There are numerous examples of faithless wives in Celtic literature, all ultimately based on sovereignty goddesses. Gwenhwyfar’s faithlessness as a core character trait later allowed French authors free rein in their treatment of the laxity of her moral code. Yet in the Welsh tales, this faithlessness is found only in relation to Medraut and not others like Melwas.

The role of Gwenhwyfar as the instigator of Camlann is widely attested in the earliest Welsh legends. Geoffrey of Monmouth (Thorpe 1966:257-259) gives us the fullest version. The triads give a different version in which Camlann is caused by a feud between Gwenhwyfar and her sister Gwenhwyfach.

There are two triads that illustrate Gwenhwyfar’s role in the battle of Camlann. Triad 84 states “Camlan, which was brought about by a quarrel between Gwenhwyfar and Gwenhwyfach,” was one of the Three Futile Battles of the Island of Britain. The Three Harmful Blows of the Island of Britain (Triad 53) states that the blow which “Gwenhwyfach struck upon Gwenhwyfar; and for that cause there took place the Action at the battle of Camlan” (Bromwich 1978; Coe and Young 1995:83). Camlann being caused by a battle between two forms or personalities of Gwenhwyfar alludes back to the mythical symbolism of the triple goddess. Here, as a prelude to Camlann, the evil face of Gwenhwyfar’s persona takes charge.

There are also three englynions which refer to the Arthurian trio. The following three stanzas were found by Jenny Rowland “in the margin of the Dingestow 8 copy of Ymddiddan Arthur a’r Eryr (Aberysywyth, National Library of Wales, MS 5268, p. 461).” The speakers appear to be Arthur and Gwenhwyfar immediately after the battle of Camlann.

[Gwenhwyfar speaks:24]

Arthur fab Uthr of the long sword

I will say to you ?now/sadly the truth:

there is a master over every strong one.

[Arthur speaks:]

Gwenhwyfar you are ?Gwenh[w]yfach.25

I have never been healed of love-sickness for you.

Medrawd is dead. I myself almost.

A surgeon has never seen a scar

where Caledfwlch [Excaliber] struck once:26

I have struck Medrawd nine times.

Another triad alludes to a conflict between Arthur and Medraut in which Gwenhwyfar is mentioned. Triad 53 (discussed above) is immediately followed in the White Book of Rhydderch by triad 54, the Three Unrestrained Ravagings, which states “the first of them (occurred) when Medrawt came to Arthur’s court in Celliwig in Cornwall;27 he left neither food nor drink that he did not consume. And he dragged Gwenhwyfar from her royal chair, and he struck a blow on her; the second unrestrained ravaging (occurred) when Arthur came to Medrawt’s court. He left neither food or drink in the court”. If Gwenhwyfar symbolized Arthur’s sovereignty, this was a grave insult. The triad does not indicate that Medraut abducted her or that she voluntarily left with him. In this case, Gwenhwyfar may only be included as a reference to Arthur’s insulted sovereignty.

While Gwenhwyfar has several significant similarities with Brigantia, these similarities might possibly be explained in other ways. Other goddesses were worshipped in the triple goddess motif and symbolized sovereignty. Her vague name, “white phantom,” may indicate that she was a relatively new mythical creation, not based solely on one particular goddess. Yet, the historical reality of Cartimandua’s situation and the fate of the Brigantian federation make the position of Brigantia’s living personification a likely role model for Gwenhwyfar.

Conclusions

The events surrounding the fall of Brigantia are strikingly similar to the events surrounding the fall of Arthur’s golden realm. The triad of Cartimandua, Venutius, and Vellocatus bear a remarkable resemblance to the Arthurian triad of Gwenhwyfar, Arthur and Medraut. These resemblances seem like far too much to be a coincidence, the shared tragedy too great. The fate of Brigantia and the role of Cartimandua and her husbands seem almost mythic and might have been relegated to the realm of legendary moral tales had the Romans not recorded them for us. The Brigantes did not bear the Roman occupation well, mounting a serious revolt at least once and never becoming fully Romanized. The memory of their last great defender against the Romans and his tragic fall would have lingered.

It is impossible to date the origin of the Arthurian trio. As later writers relegated the possible importance of Gwenhwyfar to Arthur’s sovereignty to the margins, Medraut began to bear more blame for Arthur’s fall. There is reason to believe in the far less male dominated pantheon of the early northern British where Brigantia had reigned supreme, Gwenhwyfar bore the blame completely. The triads bear witness to this condemnation as does the early good will toward Medraut. Perhaps the statement in the Annales Cambriae is itself instructive; it blames neither Arthur or Medraut (Coe and Young 1995:12-13). It is almost as if they are acting out a play choreographed by an outside force, not unlike the fates of Gwythur, son of Greidawl, and Gwyn, son of Nudd, who fight every May Day for the hand of Creiddylad, daughter of Lludd Silver-Hand, in Culhwch and Olwen (Ford 1977:131). Arthur and Medraut’s actions and fates are sealed by an outside force, the will of Gwenhwyfar. While Gwenhwyfar may have borne the blame, she may not have originally carried guilt. This behavior is a trait of her role, an exercise of her legitimate power.

Exactly how Brigantian history was imposed on the Arthurian legend has been lost during the transmission. The fate of Brigantia may have been co-opted by a new mythic creation, Arthur the defender. Alternatively, the legend of a historical Arthur may have borrowed from Brigantian history as it encompassed ever more characteristics of other historical figures and otherworldly facets. In either case, it is likely that centuries of bardic lore and folktales remolded and synthesized the tale of Arthur’s fallen realm until it fit the tragic mold set by Brigantian history. Although Roman conquest era legends circulated throughout Britain, the northern origin of this theme fits well with the numerous other associations of the early Arthurian legend with northern Britain.

Brigantes

The Brigantes

The name Brigantia represents three separate concepts: a goddess, a people, and a tribal federation. By the Roman period, the name represented a tribal federation compromising all of what would become the Roman province of Britannia Secunda, except for the Parisi territory, east of the River Derwent.

Before the arrival of the Romans, West Yorkshire and much of the Pennine uplands were occupied by a loose association of tribes known as the Brigantes. The name seems to mean ‘the high one’, which is a suitable epithet for a group of people living in the more mountainous regions of Britain. In East Yorkshire, their neighbours were another tribe called the Parisii, who appear to have had connections with the Seine valley. This accounts for the similarity of their name to that of the capital of modern France.

Historians know little about the Brigantes before the arrival of the Romans. Presumably their ruler at the time was one of those who surrendered to Claudius at Colchester in AD 43, but they are not mentioned by name. By the early 50s AD they were being ruled by Queen Cartimandua. She lost her control of the tribe in AD 69, following an uprising led by her ex-husband Venutius. The Romans put down the rebellion and then went on to conquer the rest of northern Britain.

During the post-Roman period, the province of Britannia Secunda reverted to a state more reminiscent of its pre-Roman tribal society. The civitas of the Parisi quickly became the kingdom of Deira. Rheged appears to have been formed from the civitas of the Carvetii. The Civitas Brigantium became divided into the regions or kingdoms of Elmet, Craven, and perhaps Brigantia, located on an axis from York to Catterick, plus probably others whose names have not survived. The original capital of Brigantia is unknown, Aldborough/Isurium Brigantia became the capital during the Venutius war, civitas capital of the Brigantes was then relocated to Eboracum (York) during the Roman consolidation of their northern territories.

The term Brigantia and the concept of the goddess Brigantia survived into the post-Roman period. John Koch has tentatively translated two stanzas of the poem Y Gododdin to read “as [?] Brigantia rose, ascending towards the sky” (A.58) and “the man who [?]went down into [?] Brigantia was slain on a spear shaft” (A.71) (Koch 1997:107, 113). Catterick, the site of the main action in Y Gododdin, was deep in pre-Roman Brigantian territory.

Brigantia was a goddess who manifested herself under three forms. If we can take her later manifestation in Ireland as a guide, Cormac’s Glossary tells us Brigantia represented first and foremost sovereignty, with her other two aspects representing healing and metal working (Byrne 1973; Ross 1996:456). Anne Ross further identifies Brigantia as a patroness of pastoral peoples in Ireland and Britain. The advent of Christianity did not abolish the role of Brigantia as a symbol of sovereignty. According to John Koch, “a further survival of this idea is seen in the fragmentary elegy to the 7th century Welsh king Cadwallon in which the River Braint (<*Briganti) is described as overflowing in grief for its fallen consort”.

All of the known post-Roman northern leaders located within the former territory of the Brigantian federation are found within the dynasty of Coel Hen the Protector. This creation of this super-dynasty may indicate that regions as far separate as Rheged in Cumbria and Elmet in south-eastern Brigantia were linked together in some sort of political union. This union could have taken several forms, from an actual federation with a supreme king to an alliance of tribes with a dominant king or alternatively, a succession of dominant kings exerting hegemony over the other kingdoms of the former province of Britannia Secunda. If the dynasty of Coel Hen can be seen to have been used by later scribes as a justification or rationalization for the reformation of the Brigantia polity, the localization of the Coeling dynasts suggests Brigantian territory extended beyond its limits under the Romans to include the Gododdin and part of Galloway.

Although fourth century Roman forts were abandoned all over Britain, Kenneth Dark observed “that out of at most 16 sites with later 5th-6th century evidence no fewer than 14 had probably been under the command of the Dux Britanniarum at the end of the 4th century” (Dark 1998). Not only were these sites reoccupied, they were refortified and Saxon mercenaries may have been recruited to man them, as mentioned in the Historia Brittonum (Dark 1992). The high status of these sites is illustrated by the British halls found in Birdoswald fortress (Dark 1992) and the fifth century Christian church found in the fortress of Vindolanda (Wilkinson 1998). Further occupation has been found at the two towns closest to the Wall, Carlisle and Corbridge, plus the other Brigantian towns of Catterick, Aldborough, York and Malton (Dark 1992). Placenames and Welsh tradition further specifically associate the Coelings with the Mote of Liddel, Papcastle (Derventio), and Catterick (Miller 1975). All of these sites are believed to be located within pre-Roman Brigantian territory.

In the fifth and sixth centuries, which have been called the Age of Arthur, the tribes of Greater Brigantia were indeed on their way to becoming a major power again. The combination of extensive fortification of the abandoned Roman sites and a dynasty that includes rulers located throughout the former Brigantian territory suggests that either the federation actually or functionally became reformed by alliance and/or hegemony. With the rebirth of Greater Brigantian independence, the pre-Roman past would have been recalled with pride and sorrow.

The native way of life

For many of the people of the region life must have changed little after the Roman occupation of Brigantia. Some settlements, such as Dalton Parlours near Wetherby, did develop into Roman style villas, but many seem to have continued in their old way of life throughout the Roman period. Many of these native farmstead sites can be recognised from cropmarks on agricultural land. Cropmarks are caused by the differing rates of growth between those plants which are over a buried ditch and whose roots can still get water long after the rest of the field has dried out. Such differences in colour can be seen and photographed from the air and plotted onto a map. This technique of aerial photography is especially useful on the Magnesian Limestone belt which lies to the east of Leeds, where archaeologists have identified dozens of traces of small farms and their lanes and fields.

When such sites are excavated they usually turn out to be Iron Age or Romano-British in date. The farmsteads generally consist of a few small circular huts (about 8-10m in diameter), usually within a ditched enclosure. The huts themselves were made of wooden posts forming a circle, daubed with mud and with conical thatched roofs.

The interior would be smoky and dark. There were no windows and smoke from the central hearth could only escape through a small hole in the roof. In the west of the county settlements may have looked slightly different. The walls of the huts were built of stone boulders which had probably been cleared from surrounding fields. The Grubstones, a double circle of stones on Ilkley Moor, may represent the remains of one such hut circle. Boulder walling is also used in early field walls, some of which are found in the Aire valley, and may be very early in date.

Corn storage and grinding Other than the huts themselves, few other structures can be identified in most native British farmsteads. The remains of a series of four posts arranged in the shape of squares were found at South Elmsall. Archaeologists think that the posts supported the floors of granaries or food stores. Raising the floor off the ground would help keep the food away from rats and mice. Sometimes there may be pits in which corn or other grains could have been stored, but these are rare in West Yorkshire. Burying your crop may seem an odd way to preserve food, but if the pit is lined and sealed with clay the external atmosphere cannot reach the crop and the processes of decay are halted. The principle is really the same as burying goods in air tight sealed bags today. A large number of pits are known from a site near Ledston.

Sometimes small keyhole shaped ovens are also found. Archaeologists think that these might have been used to dry out the grain before it was put into storage. When required the grain could be ground into flour by the use of a quern or hand mill. The ones which the Brigantes used are usually known as ‘beehive’ querns because of their resemblance to the old-fashioned straw beehive. They were made out of millstone grit and tended to produce a very coarse product as the stone wore away and particles of grit ended up in the flour. For better quality breads the Romans imported lava querns from Germany. These are more hard wearing and are still sometimes used by millers today.

From https://www.huddersfield1.co.uk/yorkshire/yorksbrigantia.htm

What do we know about the extent of Celtic influence in Yorkshire, the Romans found that a mixed farming economy was pursued throughout the territory of both the Brigantes and the Parisii. For their own ends the Romans would have sought to encourage the continuity of this practice, even if under the Roman yoke. In a few localities the outline of field systems reflecting the pattern of farming in the Iron Age can still be found at High Close and on nearby Lea Green, both near Grassington in Upper WharfeDale, also at Malhamdale overlooked by the 300 foot high Malham Cove. At each of the above locations, excellent examples of field systems date from either Celtic or the later Romano-British period.

According to Stabo, the Celts occupied dwellings that were round in plan with a central hearth and which usually had storage pits dug into the floor. The walls apparently were fashioned from roughly adzed planks, set end-on and placed side-by-side, to support a thatched roof. It was a pattern very nearly continuous with those used in the earlier Bronze Age, and indeed is similar to ones still used today by ethnic groups in some Third World Countries, Papua New Guinea for example.

In the North York Moors the foundations of typically Celtic huts are to be found at several localities. Some of them are contained within an outer enclosure that served a defensive function. Examples can be seen on Borrowby Moor, at Sleddale near the banks of Codhill Slack and on Levisham Moor between Little Griff and Dundale Pond. At the Sleddale site the circular outlines of five houses, each almost thirty feet in diameter and with flagged floors, are positioned near the centre of a three-hundred-feet-long enclosure. Two additional locations in the North York Moors region are easily accessible for examination. The first of these can be clearly seen adjacent to the road along the crest of Percy Cross Rigg, one and a half miles north east of Kildale. The site enjoys a wonderful open views south and southeast over to Baysdale and Commondale, and northwest to the shapely cone of Roseberry Topping. Curiously enough, the settlement is situated on a high point of the ridge called Brown Hill, but more about the significance of this shortly. Two miles away on Great Ayton Moor is an enclosure, square in plan, also dating from the Iron Age and which may have offered protection to dwellings, though there are no obvious signs of any. This is located only half a mile northwest of Oak Tree Farm. Another much more interesting place, this time at the opposite side of the vale of York, can be seen on Upper Wharfedale. This site shows up prominently on aerial photographs and is also clearly visible on the ground. It is slightly south of the village of Kilnsey at Outgang Hill. An oblong enclosure some one hundred and fifty feet by a hundred, it contains the foundations of five hut circles of the style described by Strabo, each around twenty-five feet in diameter. Two smaller enclosures exist in the northern corner. Next to this a slightly larger compound, around two hundred square yards in extent, while over the nearby wall in the pasture to the northeast, a field system covers approximately 1000 square yards.

Other groups of hut circles and field systems attributed to this period can be studied in the parallel valleys of Wensleydale and Swaledale. Here the Iron Age is well represented on Addleborough Hill, again near Stony Raise, and above West Burton to the south of Dove Scar. Two additional sites that invite a visit are found at Arngill Scar, where hut foundations occupy a ledge overlooking the River Swale, flowing here through the impressive Kisdon Gorge. Seven miles down the Dale, there is another site on Harkerside Moor close to the Maiden Castle. Here we find a few hut circles contained within an outer perimeter banking. The site is generally believed to date from the late Bronze Age, though it is possible that the site saw co-habitation between Bronze Age native and Celt, or was an adaptation contemporary with the early Iron Age. Other earthworks dating from the later period exist in the vicinity, and this together with the fact that the name ‘maiden’ incorporates the Celtic place-name element ‘dun’ meaning a fortified place, seems to lend further weight to the assumption that the Celts made use of an existing facility. This is just one instance in which place-names can provide clues to the past. The system of farming pursued by both Brigantes and Parisii was mixed arable with livestock rearing. Barley, oats, flax and rye were all cultivated, while the domesticated animals were represented by sheep, cattle, goats, pigs and horses. Grazing was confined to swampy areas of the lowlands and loftier regions of the North York Moors and Pennine regions, the better land being preserved exclusively for cereal crops. Wharfedale has produced several querns, proof that an arable economy existed concurrent with a pastoral lifestyle. In the south of the country, evidence for Iron Age farming activities has until fairly recently been rather sketchy but, with the introduction of infra-red photography as an archaeological tool, many new sites of farmsteads, enclosures and settlements have been discovered. This method of investigation is beyond the scope of the amateur but the study of conventional aerial photography is accessible to the reader fortunate enough to have access to a collection of local authority aerial photographs or even a light aircraft. When viewed from a sufficient altitude and under optimum conditions the outlines of sites can be clearly revealed. A low sun angle helps to highlight the relief of the landscape, including prehistoric remains; at other times, a light dusting of powdery snow can show up the countryside below, just as French chalk makes a fingerprint visible.

Not all sites discovered by these methods have been positively dated to the Iron Age, neither are the techniques restricted to the detection of sites from that period; it works just as well for settlements as old as the Neolithic. Either way though, these locations rarely present any visible features for the ground-based investigator. This technique has also revealed sites of suspected Iron Age around Malton, in the southern area of the North York Moors, though again these are not visible on the ground.

In our quest for the roots of the county’s past, there is an amazing oblivion to the fact that evidence is all around us, often on our very ‘doorstep’. Within our hybrid language, for instance, there are components reflecting earlier cultures. That any Celtic place-names have emerged from the Teytonic invasions of the Dark Ages and even the blitz kreig colonialism of the Normans is a measure of the lasting influence Celtic culture had on settlers like the Anglo-Saxons and Danes. Several place-name components were handed down, though not always without change. An examination of these enduring signposts to the past can enliven a day out for ramblers in the Celtic territories of Brigantia.

Throughout the region we are concerned with there are place-names identified with Celtic sources. Included among these are Rotherham, Fangfoss, Glaisdale, names beginning with Eccles and Otley’s popular playground, The Chelvin. This is almost certainly a time-warped version of another word meaning ‘ridge’ and is similar in pronunciation to the Welsh Celtic ‘Cefn’. The once fashionable spa town of Ilkley is the Olicana that was eventually to hold such a strategic importance for the Romans, while the name Craven, for the upland region forming the southern part of the Yorkshire Dales, could be derived from the Celtic Craf, referring to the wild garlic which still flourishes in woodland gills of the area. Further to the east, the North York Moors National Park has its Cod Hill and Cod Beck, both seemingly embodying the element coed, meaning wood in the Celtic tongue.

Cattle farmers

Although coins were introduced into the south of Britain before the arrival of the Romans, the habit of using money had not reached West Yorkshire before the arrival of the Romans. The Brigantes probably measured their wealth in cattle and some of the enclosures which archaeologists have identified on aerial photographs are probably stock pens to keep their animals in.

The Druids

Julius Caesar’s accounts of the Celts describe one influential caste, the Druids as men of elevated learning, absorbed with the contemplation of sacred groves, the moon, the sun and other heavenly bodies, but also bent upon appeasing their gods in the most barbaric of manners. The Druid’s pagan religion evolved a doctrine of immortality, a glorious life after death, which no doubt goes some way towards explaining the daring courage of their warriors on the battlefield.

Much of our knowledge of the Celts is owed to the Romans, but it is from them also that later cultures inherited a common misconception about this mysterious race. The Romans believed, quite incorrectly, that the so-called Druids were responsible for the erection of megalith monuments like the stone avenues at Carnac in Brittany, Stonehenge and probably our own Devil’s Arrows, no doubt built to serve their pagan excesses in times of social stress. Standing stones like those famous arrows were already ancient when the Celts arrived and contrary to what the Romans believed could not, as we now know have been erected during the Iron Age. This distorted picture of those learned High Priests of Celtic society was embroidered upon by the writings of the Victorian romantic Cartographers jumped on the ‘band wagon’ so we find natural features throughout the Country that have been linked with what were imagined to be the pagan beliefs and practices of Iron Age Britain. In Yorkshire there is a Druid’s Altar on a prominent gritstone outcrop overlooking Bingley in the Aire Valley, while near the Hamlet of Bordley, in the Yorkshire Dales National Park, a group of three standing stones is variously marked on Ordnance Survey Maps as Druid’s Circle and Druid’s Altar. This was thought originally to be the remains of an embanked circle, or due to its ruinous state, a small chambered grave. It has since been considered to be the surviving pillars of a megalith four poster, a burial site of a type normally found in Scotland. Others have conceived tenuous links between the Celts and the more prominent and strangely weathered natural rocks. The celebrated gritstone outcrops at Brimham Rocks are no exception. Just what the connection, if any, might have been between these sites and the colourful image of the Druid’s is anyone’s guess.

I would recommend a visit to the Bingley outcrop, or better still the weirdly-eroded rocks at Brimham, but wait for one of those stormy days for which the Pennines are well known. When the elements are locked in battle and leaden clouds hang overhead like harbingers of certain doom, it takes a little stretch of a fertile imagination to visualise these blackened, time ravaged stones in use as sacrificial altars. Being realistic though, it is unlikely that these exposed stations were the scenes of bloodletting or other pagan customs. The stories are no doubt good for tourism promotion. Gruesome sacrifices were prevalent in Iron Age Britain, however. We do know that some ritual interpretation manifested itself in human votive offerings. These acts were more grievous than simple bloodletting to appease the mortal gods. According to Caesar we are given to understand that the Celtic functionaries ordered huge hollow figures to be built in human likeness, fashioned from the branches of trees. Into these young men were herded and the effigy set alight in a ghastly carnage by fire. The auspices of the Celtic pantheon did not come cheap, for those unfortunates making the donations at least. Curiously enough, in the tiny village of Wensleydale village of West Witton a quaint tradition bears an uncanny resemblance to the Celtic custom, though of course it does not include human immolation. The Burning Bartle ceremony takes place annually on the Saturday nearest Saint Bartholomew’s Day. A larger than life human effigy, fashioned of Wickerwork and stuffed with straw, is paraded around the village streets until after dark, when it is burned on a bonfire to the accompaniment of a chanted rhyme:

At Penthill Crags he tore his rags

At Hunter’s Thorn he blew his horn

At Capplebank Stee he brak his knee

At Grassgill Beck he brak his neck

At Waddem’s end he couldn’t fend

At Grassgill End he made his end

 

Exactly who or what was Bartle is, today, a mystery. He may have been the sheep-stealing giant who, according to local tradition, is said to have roamed on nearby Pen Hill. Perhaps Bartle was a spirit of the extensive forests that once thrived in the dale, or is he simply the faded memory of an ancient fertility symbol? Others have suggested that it represents the Saint, and though the timing of the custom appears to support this theory, one cannot entirely dismiss the vague similarity between this and the barbaric Celtic practice. Penhill is a further link in the cultural ‘chain’, incorporating the Celtic place-name component, pen, linking present times with the Iron Age.

The three basic elements of the earth and firmament, those of air, fire and water, have been the objects of veneration in all places from the earliest of ages. In these were have the evidence in support of the earliest forms of ritual ceremony. The classical writers at the time of the Roman conquest recorded that groves, rivers, and especially wells and springs, were sacrosanct to the Celtic spiritual well being. Ordeal by fire has already been highlighted as one method by which they solicited the will and co-operation of their gods. Others existed. In Yorkshire we have the clearest evidence that a water cult persisted throughout Brigitania.

Many rivers in Yorkshire have retained their original Celtic names – Ouse, Derwent, Esk and Aire, for example. Some were dedicated to the patron water nymphs, for instance Verbeia is believed to be the ancient name for the Wharfe, named after its goddess. Others reflect the clarity, good mood or other aspect of the watercourse, as in the Nidd. Interestingly, the fort established by the Romans by the River Dana was given the Latin form of Danum, thus carrying forward the British River name component to be preserved in the modern Doncaster.

Altars consecrated to pagan divinities have been discovered in various localities. The Ilkley altar bears an inscription, which reads “Sacred to Verbeia: Clodius Fronto, perfect of the Second Cohort of Lingonions”. A second dedicated altar was found at a river shrine near Bowes.Not only were the rivers the sacred abodes of beneficial spirits, but even springs and wells held a special place in the magico-religious order of the Druids. In Brigitania votive objects in various forms were cast into watery places. In the sleepy hamlet of Settle, there is evidence to support the theory that here an important centre of Brigitanian worship once existed. The hamlet is situated at the centre of three ancient wells. Just a short stroll from the church of Saint Alkelda is the well at Bankwell, covered with a stone slab and pouring its water into a stone trough. Towards the end of the last century, a small lead figurine was found in the well. It is about 7.5 cm high and was once housed in the defunct Pigyard Museum, in Settle. It is now in private ownership. Due to its appearance the figurine was believed to be a toy dating from Tudor times. It was recognised, however, that some of the crudely executed features parallel a similar style of decoration found on a bronze shield contemporary with the La Tene culture found in a hoard at Merioneth. The similarities are so identical as to rule out coincidence. Moreover, it is even postulated that the Bankwell figurine may represent the Celtic goddess Brigantia herself – suggested that Giggleswick church stands on or close to the site of an important pagan shrine, possibly dedicated to this deity.

The church at Giggleswick is generally associated with the nearby Ebbing and Flowing Well, whose strange fluctuations have baffled travellers for centuries. It is not unreasonable to believe that this site, too, would have enjoyed some importance in those days and received its share of votive offerings. It still does if the number of coins and other objects found in it are any indication. At some time in the past all the wells in Giggleswick have enjoyed fame for their healing waters, including the Holy Well on the site of Giggleswick School next to the church. Built into the fabric of St Alkeldas in Giggleswick can be seen two carved stone heads, obviously much more ancient than the building itself, and which may originally have come from a heathen shrine at either of its three wells. One head forms a Corbel to an internal arch, while a second specimen has been incorporated into the outer surface of the north wall of the nave, where it gazes coldly in the direction of the Ebbing Well a mile away to the north-west. These carved heads have been identified with a Celtic Pagan Cult, which persisted in the Iron Age Brigantia, but we shall discuss this further in the next chapter. Another matter, linked in some way with the Bankwell figurine, concerns the so-called naked man café, formerly an inn of the same name.

Besides making votive offerings to lakes, pools and other aqueous features of landscape, objects were also deposited in caves or cast down any convenient natural shaft. In Wookey Hole, Somerset, a famous instance was the discovery of several human skulls. Given the fact that Craven was at the heart of Brigantia one wonders what role if any, the deep abyss of Gaping Gill played in Celtic Paganism? It is easy to allow the imagination drift back two millennia, to a scene of human sacrifice, victims cast into the depths of this frightful pot-hole as libation to the deities of the nether regions. Within the cultural context of caves the significance of Attermire Cave leaves us in no doubt. Iron types of wheels, lynch pins and nails discovered at this site could simply have been the remains of a native wain, though its location in a cliff face remote from the nearest possible track makes this very unlikely. Somebody went to a lot of drag the vehicle up a steep scree slope, not easy to negotiate even without a burden, and to deposit it carefully within the cave. This is a sure indication of some ritual activity, despite the lack of sepulchral deposits.

The Fall of Brigantia

When the Romans arrived in the first century, they found the vast Brigantian tribal federation in the neck of Britain organized under Queen Cartimandua (c. 43 to c. 70 AD), whose seat was at the massive fortification of Stanwick.6 Cartimandua’s husband was acknowledged as king, assuming the role as the Brigantian warlord. The Roman historian Tacitus (Annals 12.40, 2-7; Histories 3.45; Koch 1995:39-40) specifically acknowledges that it was Cartimandua, the living symbol of Brigantia, who held the ultimate power among the Brigantes and had an active role in choosing her husband/warlord. Indeed, it has been suggested that the Welsh word for king, brenin, is derived from brigantinos meaning the consort of Brigantia (Koch 1995:39). The Romans must have been pleased when they found that Cartimandua favored establishing formal contacts and alliances with them. Although firm evidence is lacking, it is believed that Brigantia became a Roman client kingdom as early as the 40’s AD (Hanson and Campbell 1986:73).

Initially, Brigantia prospered as a client state and grew wealthy. In 51 AD, Caratacus son of Cunobelinus, the leader of Celtic resistance to the Romans in the south, was captured and brought before Cartimandua, who promptly turned him over to the Romans.8 Tacitus (3.45; Koch 1995:40) credited Cartimandua’s capture of Caratacus as “having secured the most important component of Emperor Claudius’s triumph”.

In the following years, relations broke down between the Brigantian Royal houshold. Cartimandua divorced her husband Venutius and took as her husband another warrior named Vellocatus (“better in battle”), Venutius’s former armor bearer. However this was no simple divorce for, by this action, her new husband became king. Tacitus (3.45; Koch 1995:39-40) recorded that the divorce and remarriage prompted a civil war among the Brigantes because the majority of the people preferred Venutius as king. Yet, Cartimandua’s will prevailed, “favoring the illegitimate husband [Vellocatus] were the queen’s libido and her ferocious temper” (Tacitus 3.45; Koch 1995:40).

Venutius, who had previously fought for the Romans, turned to the anti-Roman faction among the Brigantes for support and ignited a civil war. The war continued for some time among the Brigantes until Venutius was on the eve of victory. With Cartimandua in a compromised position, the Romans intervened to save their ally (Salway 1993:92). Roman intervention saved Cartimandua but in the end her actions gave the Romans an excuse to conquer Brigantia.11 The Romans could not tolerate the long Brigantian border in the hands of a hostile king who could not only attack the south himself but also harbor Roman enemies from the south (Salway 1993:92). To the Brigantians, the fault for their conquest by the Romans would have fallen squarely on the shoulders of Cartimandua and the war between her husbands . . . and would not have been forgotten.

Cartimandua was capable of such behavior because she was a living representative of the goddess of sovereignty, Brigantia (Koch 1995:39-40; Ross 1996:354-355). According to Anne Ross, “Cartimandua’s powerful role in Roman times may suggest that society recognized the power of the goddess by mirroring her authority in its own temporal ruler. . . . This particular goddess may have been as much concerned with the actual tribal hegemony as with the territory” (Ross 1996:456). According to Patrick Ford, horses were intimately associated with goddesses of sovereignty (Ford 1977: 8-10). It is possible that Cartimandua inherited this role since her name literally means “sleek pony” (Ross 1996:449).

Brigantia was a goddess who manifested herself under three forms. If we can take her later manifestation in Ireland as a guide, Cormac’s Glossary tells us Brigantia represented first and foremost sovereignty, with her other two aspects representing healing and metal working (Byrne 1973; Ross 1996:456). Anne Ross further identifies Brigantia as a patroness of pastoral peoples in Ireland and Britain.12 The advent of Christianity did not abolish the role of Brigantia as a symbol of sovereignty. According to John Koch, “a further survival of this idea is seen in the fragmentary elegy to the 7th century Welsh king Cadwallon in which the River Braint (<*Briganti) is described as overflowing in grief for its fallen consort”.13

Atrebates

The Atrebates

Background to the Atrebates

Location of the tribe
The Atrebates were located in the south of England, along what is now Hampshire.

Background information
One thing that is unclear about the Atrebates, is their origin. Like some tribes in Britain, they had a counterpart tribe in Gaul. It is not recorded whether the Atebates began their existence in Britain end expanded to Belgic Gaul, or vice versa. As the majority of tribes began life in Europe before expanding to Britain, it seems likely the latter is the most reasonable assumption.

The Atrebates were one of the more successful tribes and also one of the most civilised. For many years before the Romans arrived, they had been trading with the tribes in Europe. Indeed when the Romans took Gaul, the Atrebates saw this as a chance for more trade and so increased their output of fine cloths, hunting dogs and items that would be useful, especially to the military.

Having contacts so close across the water enabled them to take on new ideas, which gave them the advantage in developing their culture and technology.

Principal towns and settlements in Atrebatian territory

Calleva Atrebatum – The Capital (Silchester, Hampshire) The oppidum at Calleva (Silchester) developed in size and importance to become the main centre of the Atrebates tribe.
Cvnetio – (Mildenhall, Wiltshire)
Thatcham – (Berkshire) – Posting station on the road between Calleva and Cunetio
(Guildford -(Surrey) – Probable Roman settlement on the Pilgrims Way south-east of Calleva.
Spinis – This name is open to interpretation -( nr. Lambourne, Berkshire) – Itinerary road station west of Thatcham
(Reading – Berkshire)
– It is strongly suspected there was a settlemnt here established by the Romans

The Atrebates and the Romans

In 55 and 54 BC, Julius Caesar sent Roman legions to Britain on a misson that were regarded more as expeditions that full blown invasions. Commius took a prime role against Caesar by acting as an ambassador for the British tribes who opposed the Roman general. Commius later turned against his former friends and led the Atrebates in an unsuccessful attempt to overthrow Vercingatorix during the Siege of Alesia in 53BC. Now the enemy of Caesar, Commius fled the continent in 51 BC, but still kept his links with Britain open. Frontinus tells us how Commius escaped from Caesar by devious means. It is not surprise that Caesar omited these deatils rom his accounts of his escapades in Britain.

‘Commius, the Atrebatian, when defeated by the deified Julius, fled from Gaul to Britain, and happened to reach the Channel at a time when the wind was fair, but the tide was out. Although the vessels were stranded on the flats, he nevertheless ordered the sails to be spread. Caesar, who was following from a distance, seeing the sails swelling with the full breeze, and imagining Commius to be escaping from his hands and to be proceeding on a prosperous voyage, abandoned the pursuit.’

Some of the Atrebatian kings

Commius the Gaul Probably eminated from the Atrebates tribe in Gaul He became an aide of Julius Caesar, possibly sometime during 56BC, and helped the Romans during both expeditions to Britain, where in 54BC he persuaded King Cassivellaunus to succumb to the Romans.

In 51BC he joined forces with other Gaulish leaders in an attempt to overcome Vercingetorix during the siege of Alesia. His Atrebatean warriors along with the other Gaulish tribes were defeated by Caesar. The following year, realising that there would be no escape from Caesar’s retribution, he came to terms with his legate, Marcus Antonius (the famous Mark Antony), and offered some of his own family as hostages. Not satisfied that he could trust Antony, he fled to Britain and vowed never to have anything to do with the Romas again. He founded a dynasty among the existing Atrebatean settlers.

Commius the Younger Commius the Younger, succeeded his father Commius the Gaul in 35BC and ruled until 20BC, when he was succeeded by his own sons, first Tincommius, then Eppillus and afterwards, Verica..

Tincommius The eldest son of Commius the Younger, with whom he jointly ruled for a number of years until his father’s death 20BC. It is possible that during the period of joint rule, Tincommius governed the southern half of the Atrebatean territory from Noviomagus, where he stayed in the south. His brother Eppillus governed the territory north of Calleva, and was to be the downfall of Tincommius, for it is from this time that the oppidum at Calleva developed into the main centre of Atrebatean power, under the rule of Eppilus.

Around 5BC, it would appear that diplomatic initiatives were instated between Tincommius and the emperor which were bonded in a treaty. These pro-Roman attitudes, in direct opposition to those of his father, possibly caused a break in the Atrebatean upper classes who moved north and founded Dobunni. Before 7AD was overthrow in a coup launched by his younger brother Eppillus and was deposed. He travelled to Rome to plead for reinstatement before Emperor Augustus. This request was refused as Augustus was in no position to mount a military campaign in Britain at this time. Not only was Timcommius cast out of Britain, Eppillus was officially recognised as king by Rome.

Eppillus A son of Commius the Younger. His elder brother Tincommius took the Atrebatean throne following a period of joint rule after their father’s death 20BC. Tincommius continued to rule the kingdom from Noviomagus on the south coast, and left his brother Eppillus to govern the northern tribal lands from Calleva. Eppillus appeared to play the subordinate to his brother, but this was merely a ploy to lull Tincommius into a false sense of security. In 7AD he conspired to remove Tincommius from the Atrebatean throne, forcing him to flee to Rome to ask Emperor. Augustus to give him back his throne..Augustus did not want to bother himself with the situation, however, and recognised Eppillus as king of the Atrebates. His reign over the Atrebates was short, and around 15AD he was deposed by his younger brother Verica who possibly raised support among the upper members of the Atrebates. Eppilius escaped to Kent, where in turn, he overthrew either Dubnovellaunus or Vosenios as king.

Verica The youngest son of Commius the Younger. After his brother Eppillus deposed their elder brother Tincommius from the Atrebatean thone ib.5AD, Verica built up a following of Atrebatean nobles opposed to the rule of Eppillus. With their help he took the throne from Eppillus for himself around 15AD. Like both of his brothers before him, he was recognised by Rome as the Atrebatian king. He ruled the Atrebates for many years from the capital of Calleva before being forced out by Epaticcus, who was the brother of Cunobelin. This probably occurred in 25AD. It would seem that Verica continued to fight his rival for some time, being forced gradually further south by his stronger opponent. Around AD35 however, Epaticcus was either killed or died naturally, and Verica made some progress toward retaking the lands lost to the Catuvellauni.

European Celtic Tribes

The Celtic Iron Age tribes of Gaul, known collectively as the Gauls, were not a single homogenous group but a vibrant mosaic of communities, each with its own customs, social structures, and political systems. Their story unfolds across the verdant landscapes of what is now modern-day France, Luxembourg, Belgium, and parts of Italy, Switzerland, the Netherlands, and Germany, where they thrived from the 5th century BC until their eventual integration into the Roman Empire.

The Gauls were renowned for their mastery of ironworking, which revolutionized their agricultural and military capabilities, allowing them to carve out a dominant position in Iron Age Europe. Their society was complex and hierarchical, organized into tribes led by chieftains and kings, and deeply influenced by the druids, who held immense sway over both religious and secular affairs.

The Gauls’ artistry in metalwork, particularly in iron and gold, was matched by their prowess in battle, with their warriors known for their ferocity and distinctive war gear. Despite their martial skill, the Gauls were also traders and craftsmen, creating intricate designs that served both symbolic and functional purposes.

Their polytheistic religion, with a pantheon of gods associated with natural phenomena, war, trade, and crafts, was overseen by the druids, whose rituals often involved offerings and sacrifices. The Gauls’ legacy is not merely one of conflict; it is a story of cultural richness, societal complexity, and the enduring impact of their integration into the Roman world, which gave rise to the Gallo-Roman culture. This introduction aims to peel back the layers of time to explore the lives, beliefs, and legacies of these remarkable Iron Age peoples.

These tribes were united by a common Celtic language known as Gaulish and shared cultural traits, such as the La Tène artistic style. They were organized into various tribes and confederations, each with its own leadership and territories. The society was structured with a class system, including warriors, druids, and commoners. The Gauls are perhaps best known for their conflicts with the Roman Republic, particularly during the Gallic Wars led by Julius Caesar, which ultimately led to their subjugation and the Romanization of the region. Despite this, the Gauls left a lasting legacy on European history, culture, and language.

Aedui

A paramount tribe in central Gaul (France) occupying the territory around Autun. By virtue of their position close to the Rhône trade route, they adopted elements of classical culture. By Caesar’s time, because of intertribal fighting, their position of supremacy was declining, but by aligning themselves with Rome they soon restored their former importance.

Ambiani

The Ambiani, for instance, were known for their minting of coins and inhabited the region around modern-day Amiens.

Aulerci

The Aulerci, for example, were divided into several branches, including the Eburovices and Cenomani, and were known for their fierce independence.

Averni

A powerful tribe occupying the Massif Central in Caesar’s time. They were violently opposed to Roman rule.

Belgae

The Belgae, a powerful confederation of tribes in northern Gaul, were noted for their fierce resistance against Roman expansion.

Bellovaci

The Bellovaci, residing in the area of Beauvais, were one of the most powerful and warlike tribes, known for their fierce resistance against Roman forces.

Bituriges

The Bituriges, dwelling in the central part of Gaul, were influential through their control of sacred sites and their role in trade routes.

Bodiocasses

the Bodiocasses were a smaller tribe located in the Normandy region, were strategically placed along important trade routes.

Boii

The Boii were one of the more mobile of the Celtic tribes. In the fifth century, a substantial number migrated from north of the Alps and settled in the Po valley (Italy), the rest staying in the traditional territories in Bohemia. The north Italian group suffered under the Roman advance, while those in Bohemia later migrated westward into France, forced out by the Cimbri and Teutons.

Cadurci

The Cadurci, who lived in the area of Cahors, were fierce warriors and skilled horsemen.

Caletes

The Caletes, settled in the modern Haute-Normandie region, were skilled seafarers. They held significant maritime prowess, suggesting a strong tradition of seafaring and trade.

Carnutes

The Carnutes held a central position in Gaulish territory and are remembered for their sacred forest where the annual gathering of the druidic assembly took place.

Catalauni

The Catalauni, located in the Champagne region, were another distinct group, whose name is preserved in the modern city of Châlons-en-Champagne.

Cenomani

The Cenomani, located in the Le Mans region, had a strategic position along key trade routes.

Curiosolitae

The Curiosolitae, located in modern-day Brittany, were notable for their seafaring and trading prowess.

Diablintes

The Diablintes, situated in the northwest of Gaul, had a smaller territory but were strategically positioned along important trade routes.

Eburovices

The Eburovices, for example, were located in the modern-day region of Normandy and were known for their resistance against Caesar during the Gallic Wars.

Eravisci

A tribe occupying much of Transdanubia (Hungary) with one of their principal settlements on the Danube around modern-day Budapest. They may have moved into the region from the north in the first century A.D. Eraviscan culture remained strong throughout the early part of the Roman occupation: Celtic dress and jewellery continued to be worn even by the rich families as is witnessed by tombstone reliefs.

Helvetii

A tribe occupying much of modern Switzerland. In the first century A.D., as a result of population growth and pressure from tribes to the north, they decided to migrate westward into Gaul (i.e. France). In 58 B.C. Caesar halted their migration and defeated them, forcing the remnants to return home.

Lemovices

The Lemovices, who inhabited the area around modern Limoges, were renowned for their craftsmanship in enamels and metalwork.

Lexovii

The Lexovii, neighbours to the Eburovices, occupied the area around present-day Lisieux and were involved in the maritime trade.

Mandubii

The Mandubii were known for their fortified settlement at Alesia, the site of the decisive battle where Julius Caesar defeated Vercingetorix.

Mediomatrici

The Mediomatrici, in the region of Metz, were recognized for their metallurgical skills and agricultural prosperity.

Menapii

The Menapii, who lived along the North Sea coast, were recognized for their fierce independence and control over the marshlands.

Morini

The Morini, at the closest point to Britain, were involved in cross-channel trade and occasional raids.

Namnetes

The Namnetes, settled around the Loire estuary, played a significant role in maritime commerce.

Nervii

One of the Belgic tribes of northern Gaul (France) living in central Belgium, east of the Scheldt. They put up powerful resistance to Caesar and were virtually annihilated by him.#

Nitiobriges

The Nitiobriges, settled around Agen, were involved in trade along the Garonne river.

Osismii

The Osismii inhabited the western tip of Brittany and were known for their seafaring and trading activities.

Parisii

The Parisii, giving their name to the modern city of Paris, settled along the Seine and were known for their craftsmanship and trade.

Petrocorii

The Petrocorii inhabited the region around present-day Périgueux and were known for their craftsmanship in metalwork.

Pictones

The Pictones, inhabiting the region around modern-day Poitiers, were recognized for their strong agricultural practices and minting their own coinage.

Raurici

The Raurici, near modern Basel, played a significant role in trade due to their location at the crossroads of several important routes.

Redones

The Redones, located in the Brittany region, were influential in the network of trade routes across the channel.

Remi

The Remi, who inhabited the region around modern-day Reims, were known for their horse breeding and as skilled negotiators.

Ruteni

The Ruteni, located in the region of Rodez, had a strategic position along the trade routes between the Mediterranean and Atlantic coasts.

Santones

The Santones, in the western part of Gaul, were notable for their prosperous port of Santonum, now the city of Saintes.

Scordisci

After the migration into Greece had failed, many thousands of Celts poured back into Central Europe to find land to settle. One group, the Scordisci, led by Bathanatos, settled between the rivers Drava and Sava with an oppidum on the site of modern Beograd. They were a powerful force in the subsequent settlement in the rest of Transdanubia.

Segusiavi

The Segusiavi were located in the region of Lyon and were known for their strategic position along the Rhône river.

Senones

The Senones were renowned for their sack of Rome in 390 BC under the leadership of Brennus

Sequani

The Sequani, controlling the strategic trade routes along the Doubs river, were influential in the iron trade, which was vital for weaponry and tools.

Sotiates

The Sotiates, dwelling in the southwest, were known for their resistance against Roman forces.

Sulbanectes

The Sulbanectes were located near modern-day Soissons. 

Suessiones

The Suessiones, neighbours to the Remi, held strategic territories along the river valleys and were known for their agricultural prosperity.

Treveri

The Treveri, located in the northeastern region, were esteemed for their cavalry.

Veliocasses

The Veliocasses, were located in the vicinity of Rouen.

Velocasses

The Velocasses, who settled in the modern-day Normandy region, were known for their agricultural practices and strategic trade routes.

Venetii

Maritime tribe living in the southwest of the Armorican peninsula. They were traders and acted as middlemen in shipping goods from Britain to the south.In 56 B.C., they rebelled against Caesar but were soundly beaten in a sea battle at Quiberon, and as a result all the leading men executed and the rest sold as slaves.

Viducasses

The Viducasses, located in the Normandy region, were a smaller tribe but were strategically placed along important trade routes. 

Vocontii

The Vocontii inhabited the southeastern part of Gaul and were known for their peaceful nature and prosperous agriculture.

Volcae

The Volcae were originally neighbours of the Boii in Central Europe. An offshoot of the tribe probably contributed to the Volcae Tectosages, one branch of them settled in southern Gaul (France) while the other moved into Anatolia. The Gaulish group possessed a vast treasure of gold and silver which was pillaged by the Romans in 106 B.C.

The Volcae were split into two groups—the Tectosages and the Arecomici—held territories in the southern part of Gaul.

Legacy of the Gauls

These ancient Gaulish tribes are remembered today through a variety of means, reflecting their enduring impact on European history and culture. Many of their names are preserved in the places they once inhabited, such as the Parisii in Paris, the Remi in Reims, and the Helvetii in the Swiss region of Helvetia.

Their legacy is also evident in numerous archaeological sites across France and neighbouring countries, where excavations have unearthed settlements, artifacts, and inscriptions that offer insights into their way of life. Museums display these findings, providing a tangible connection to the past.

Additionally, the Gauls have captured the imagination of the public and scholars alike, featuring prominently in literature, art, and popular media. The fusion of Roman and Gaulish cultures gave rise to the Gallo-Roman civilization, which has left a lasting mark on the legal, architectural, and linguistic heritage of contemporary society.

Celtic Tribes

The known British Celtic Tribes, an overview

The Iron Age in Britain was a period of profound social transformation and cultural vibrancy, marked by the emergence of distinct tribal identities that would shape the island’s history for centuries to come. As the Bronze Age waned, a new era dawned, characterized by the use of iron, which revolutionized tools and weaponry, and gave rise to a patchwork of tribes across the British landscape. These tribes, each with their unique customs, beliefs, and political structures, were the ancestors of the peoples of modern Britain.

The names of these tribes, such as the Iceni, Trinovantes, and Catuvellauni in the south, the Brigantes in the north, and the Silures and Ordovices in the west, were recorded by Roman and Greek historians and geographers, particularly Ptolemy, whose accounts provide invaluable insights into the distribution and territories of these groups. The archaeological record, enriched by the distribution of Celtic coins and pottery assemblages, offers a tangible link to these Iron Age societies, revealing the complexity of their settlements, from hillforts to sophisticated roundhouses.

The Iron Age tribes of Britain were not isolated entities; they interacted with each other and with continental Europe, as evidenced by shared names with tribes in France and Belgium, suggesting movements of people and ideas across the Channel.

This period also saw the rise of powerful chieftains and the formation of tribal kingdoms, hinting at a hierarchical society that valued warrior prowess, as reflected in the richly adorned weaponry and chariots buried with their elite. The legacy of the Iron Age tribes is not merely an academic curiosity; it is a story of resilience, innovation, and the enduring human spirit, which continues to captivate and inspire. As we delve into the history of these ancient Britons, we uncover a narrative that is integral to understanding the cultural and historical fabric of Britain, a narrative that is as complex as it is fascinating.

Atrebates

The Atrebates (pronounced Atre-bar-te) occupied the area now known as Hampshire. This British tribe shares its name with and has close relations with another tribe in pre-Roman France (Gaul). This tribe was the second most powerful group in southern Britain at the time of the Roman Conquest. They issued and used coins, and had many contacts with France. They probably consisted of a group of tribes ruled by a single dynasty. Their territory originally stretched from what is today West Sussex, Hampshire and Berkshire.

After the Roman Conquest, their territory was divided into three separate civitates. One tribal centre was at the major settlement at Silchester, near Reading. Another major Royal centre, comparable to those at St Albans, Colchester and Stanwick, was at Chichester. The Atrebates had long links of trade with France, and it is likely that people from the Atrebates were related by married to people from French tribes. The origin of the name Atrebates may have come from France.

A French leader from the French tribes called the Atrebates, Commius, fled to Britain during Julius Caesar’s conquests of Gaul. Commius then appears as the name of the Atrebates ruler. From about 15 BC, the Atrebates seem to have established friendly relations with Rome, and it was an appeal for help from the last Atrebatic king, Verica, which provided Claudius with the pretext for the invasion on Britain in AD 43. After the Roman Conquest, the territory of the Atrebates was divided up, with Silchester (Calleva Atrebatum) becoming the capital of a Roman civitas the administered the area of modern Berkshire, Oxfordshire, Surrey and north Hampshire. The name Atrebates means ‘settlers’ or ‘inhabitants’.

Belgae

The Belgae were probably not a British tribe. Rather the Romans created this civitas (an administrative unit within a Roman province). Before the Roman Conquest, the whole of the territory between what is today, West Sussex, Hampshire and Berkshire was the territory of the Atrebates.

The Romans applied the name Belgae to a whole group of tribes in northwest Gaul, but the appearance of a civitas of this name in Britain is something of a mystery. According to the Roman geographer Ptolemy, its territory included not only Winchester but also Bath, and a nearby, but as yet unidentified settlement called Ischalis. It seems likely that Ptolemy has made an error here since the resulting shape of the territory of the Belgae would bear little resemblance to pre-Roman tribal geography and would be something of an administrative nightmare.

If the civitas was actually focussed around Winchester (called by the Romans Venta Belgarum – town of the Belgae) there is still a problem, since this area seems to have been part of the old kingdom of the Atrebates. The civitas of the Belgae was therefore most probably an artificial creation of the Roman administration, like the neighbouring civitas of the Regni, and was created at about the same time in c. AD 80 following the death of King Cogidubnus. Its administrative capital at Winchester was known as Venta Belgarum, which was an important settlement before the Roman Conquest.

Brigantes

This large tribe was, like the Votadini, a federation of smaller communities. The name means ‘upland people’ or ‘hill dwellers’. This name is very appropriate as the Pennines formed the heart of their territory. After the Roman Conquest, the Brigantes were formed into a huge civitates, or administrative unit that covered most of Yorkshire, Cleveland, Durham and Lancashire.

It stretched from the North Sea to the Irish Sea. We know the names of some of the smaller tribes they comprised the Brigantes at the time of the Roman Conquest. They include the Setanti in Lancashire, the Lopocares, the Corionototae and the Tectoverdi around the Tyne valley.

This huge area was very varied. As well as people living in the Dales and hills, many people farmed the fertile land in Durham, Tyneside and Teeside. At the time of the Roman Conquest, people in this region wore swords carried in distinctive local metal scabbards that were highly decorated. An important centre for the Brigantes was built at Stanwick in North Yorkshire in the first century AD.

This was probably the capital of King Venutius after he defeated Cartimandua in AD69. Cartimandua, the rightful ruler of the Brigantes and Venutius’ ex-wife was friendly towards the Romans, but her husband became anti-Roman after their split. Venutius and Cartimandua fought for many years until in 69AD when she was finally expelled from the kingdom. In 70 AD, the Romans invaded and occupied the territory and completed their conquest of the Britons and went on to conquer much of Scotland. In the subsequent years of the Roman occupation, the Brigantes were the cause of many serious revolts, which culminated in the building of Hadrian’s Wall.

Carvetii

This tribe lived in what is today Cumbria. They are a poorly known group which were made into their own civitas (an administrative unit or ‘county’) in the Roman Province. There is very little archaeological evidence of the people who lived in this area before the Roman Conquest. Like their neighbours, the Novantae, these people probably lived in small farms. They did not use coins or have big hillforts. The Carvetii might have been a smaller tribe within the large kingdom or federation of the Brigantes.

Cantii

 

Cantiaci

This is the name of the tribe or people who lived in north and east Kent. Like other peoples in southeast Britain at the time of the Roman Conquest, this group was very open to influences from France and the Mediterranean World. They had been using coins for at least 150 years. Like the Catuvellauni and Trinovantes they buried their dead according to the north French custom of cremation. This small tribe became part of the large kingdom of Cunobelinus. After the Roman Conquest, they became a civitas based on their principal settlement at Canterbury. The name of the modern city of Canterbury still contains the name of this Iron Age tribe.

Caledones (Caledonii)

This is the name of peoples who lived in the Scottish Highlands and Islands. The Romans used the word Caledones to describe both a single tribe who lived in the Great Glen between the modern towns of Inverness and Fort William. They also called all the tribes living in the north Caledonians. We know the names of some of these other tribes. They include the Cornovii and Smertae who probably lived in Caithness, the Caereni who lived in the far west of the Highlands, the Carnonacae and the Creones in the Western Highlands. The Vacomagi lived in and around the Cairngorns.

Other unknown tribes lived in Orkney, Shetland and the Hebrides. Warriors from many of these tribes came together to resist the Romans under a leader called Calgacus at the battle of Mons Graupius in AD 84. Although the Romans won this battle, they never successfully conquered the Highlands. The Romans admired the Caledonii for their ability to endure cold, hunger and hardship.

Tacitus described them as red-haired and large-limbed. All these tribes lived very different lifestyles than neighbouring peoples in other parts of Scotland. In many areas, they lived in tall stone towers, called Brochs, or other fortified sites, called Duns. Unlike the Taexali and Venicones, the Caledones rarely made religious offerings of fine metal objects.

Catuvellauni

The Catuvellauni were the tribe that lived in the modern counties of Hertfordshire, Bedfordshire and southern Cambridgeshire. Their territory also probably included tribes in what is today Buckinghamshire and parts of Oxfordshire. The tribal name possibly means ‘good in battle’. The Catuvellauni existed as a tribe at the time of Julius Caesar, but in the following years became a mighty group. Their first known king was Tasciovanus, who is known from the coins he minted with his name on them.

He founded a royal and ritual centre at Verulamium, modern St Albans in about AD10. There were several other large settlements or clusters of villages in their territory, such as at Baldock and Welwyn. Before this time, the Catuvellauni, Trinovantes and Cantiaci were very different from other British tribes. They had been using coins for at least a century, adopted the same way of burying the dead as was practised in northern France, and eat and dressed in ways more common in France than in other parts of Briton.

Tasciovanus’ successors created a large kingdom through conquest and alliance that included the Trinovantes and Cantiaci. The most successful king was Cunobelinus (Cymbeline) who had maintained a pro-Roman stance until his death in 40 AD. Afterwards, two of his three sons, Caracatu and Togidubnus became anti-Roman and invaded the Atrebates and the Trinovantes (held by their pro Roman Brother Adminius).

This was the reason that Claudius used to invade and conquer southern Britain in 43 AD. Apart from this brief period, the Catuvellauni were one of the most pro-Roman of British peoples. They rapidly and peacefully adopted Roman lifestyles and Roman rule after the conquest. A wealthy grave of a pro-Roman Catuvellaunian ruler who lived at the time of the Roman Conquest has been excavated at Folly Lane, St Albans. They became one of the first civitas in the new province, Verulamium becoming one of the first and most successful cities in Roman Britain.

Corieltauvi (Coritani)

Another of the larger tribes, with tribal capitals and extensive farmlands. After the conquest of 43AD they were probably one of the first to become suppliant. However, between 43AD and 47AD the Romans found cause to enter the territory of the Coritani and made a legionary fortress of the capital Retae (Leicester). It is likely that those tribes north of Leicester were brought under the administration of Brigantia, who were enjoying a fruitful relationship with the Romans.

This large tribe appears to have been created only shortly before the Roman Conquest of Britain. It offered no resistance to the Romans and was quickly turned into a civitas (an administrative district equivalent to a modern county) with its capital at the city of Leicester. The Corieltauvi combined groups of people living in what is today most of the East Midlands (Lincolnshire. Leicestershire, Nottinghamshire, Derbyshire, Northamptonshire). Before about 50 to 1 BC, archaeological evidence suggests two different groups or tribes lived in this region.

One lived in what is today Lincolnshire, the other in what is today Northamptonshire. Both areas were different to each other and were important centres of population and economy in the period c. 400 and 100 BC. At this time, Leicestershire was not a critical area. The Corieltauvi are known from their coins that are found throughout the East Midlands. This group appears to have been a new federation that united earlier different groups. This was a region where people lived in villages, and sometimes larger settlements. Leicester was certainly an important large settlement before the Roman Conquest, as were a number of large settlements in Lincolnshire, such as Dragonby and Old Sleaford. Between 43AD and 47AD the Romans found cause to enter the territory of the Coritani and made a legionary fortress of the capital Retae (Leicester), moving the IX legion there as part of the early Roman expansion.

Cornovii

The Cornovii are a surprisingly obscure tribe, given that they lay well within the boundaries of the Roman province and their civitas capital, Wroxeter, was one of the largest in Britain. They share their name with a Caledonian tribe who lived in the far north of Scotland. The name probably means ‘people of the horn’. There is no reason to think that this group shared any common ancestry with the group in Caithness. Many tribes or peoples in Europe at the time of the Roman Conquest shared similar names. This might be because these tribes had contacts with each other. But it is just as likely to be a coincidence, as people used similar types of names for themselves such as ‘the people of the mountains’ or ‘the brave people’ etc. The Cornovii never issued coinage and before the Roman Conquest and left little evidence behind. They probably lived in what are today the modern counties of Staffordshire, Shropshire and Cheshire.

Damnonii

This tribe lived in the central part of Scotland around what is today Glasgow and Strathclyde. The name of this tribe could be spelt either as Damnonii or as Dumnonii. The Dumnonii is also the name of a tribe who lived in Devon and Cornwall at the same time. Many tribes in Britain and France at the time of the Roman Conquest shared similar names. In some cases, this was probably due to part migrations of tribes due to internal conflict or external factors such as the expansion of Rome, it could also be coincidence, as people used similar types of names for themselves, such as ‘the people of the mountains’, ‘people of the horn’ or ‘the brave people’ etc. The Dumnonii were conquered by the Romans and for many years their territory was occupied by the Roman army before they retreated further south to the line of Hadrian’s Wall.

Deceangli

The Deceangli, the Ordovices and the Silures were the three main tribal groups who lived in the mountains of Wales. The Deceangli were the peoples of what is today north Wales. They probably included the peoples who lived and supported the Druid centre on the Isle of Anglesey. The Romans considered Anglesey, or Mona as they and the locals at the time called it, as the stronghold of the Druids in Britain. The Romans learnt that many Kings in Gaul would send their son’s to Mona for education, thus reinforcing this illegal religion, this made Mona a prime target for the Romans.

Caratacus‘ last battle was Close by in Newtown in the Territory of the Ordovices, helping to prevent the fall of Mona, after he was defeated, the local Brigantes revolted, helping to stall the Roman advance. On the eve of Boudica’s revolt in what is today East Anglia, the Roman Army had only just completed the long and difficult task of conquering the tribes living in the Welsh Mountains. The final episode of that conquest was the invasion of Anglesey and the slaughter of the Druids there.

Demetae

These were the people who lived in the fertile lands of Pembrokeshire and much of Carmarthenshire in southwest Wales. They lived in small farms scattered across the countryside. This people shared many features of their lives with their neighbours across the Bristol Channel in Devon and Cornwall. They were friendly towards the Romans and quickly adapted to Roman rule. Unlike their more warlike and scattered neighbours in the mountains of Wales; the Silures and the Ordovices. Because of this, the Demetae did not need to be intensively garrisoned by the Roman army, except along their eastern border, which may have been to protect them from their hostile neighbours, the Silures. The tribe was incorporated into the province of Britannia and became a civitas (an administrative unit, or county, within the Roman province). The capital of the Roman civitas was at Carmarthen (Moridundum Demetarum).

Dubunni

This large tribe lived in the southern part of the Severn Valley and the Cotswolds. They were one of the few groups to issue coins before the Roman Conquest. The main distribution of these coins shows that the Dubunni occupied or ruled an area as far south as the Mendip’s. The coins also hint that the group was divided into northern and southern subgroups. The Dubunni lived in very fertile farmland in farms and small villages. They did not resist the Roman Conquest, unlike their neighbours, Silures. Indeed, they may have been one of the first tribes to submit to the Romans, even before the Romans reached their territory. The Dubunni had a central or important settlement at Bagendon in Gloucester, on the eastern edge of their territory. This centre was replaced by the important Roman city of Cirencester, which became the capital of the Dubunnic civitas after the Roman Conquest.

Dumnonii

A British tribe that occupied the whole of the South West peninsula and parts of Southern Somerset. They did not use coins. Nor did they have large settlements to act of political centres for the tribe. The Dumnonii were probably a group of smaller tribes that lived across the large area of Cornwall, Devon and Somerset. There is no evidence for a dynasty of Dumnonian kings. People lived in small farmsteads, usually surrounded by large walls. They shared similar styles of highly decorated pottery. There is also evidence for contacts and trade with Brittany.

However, there were also local differences in the types of settlements and other aspects of life between different parts of Devon and Cornwall. Cornwall was one of the few parts of Britain where the dead were buried at this time. The Dumnonii appear to have accepted the Roman conquest without resistance and as a result, few garrison forts were placed in their territory. Yet, this area never fully adopted Roman ways of life. Lifestyles and types of settlements remained little changed from the Iron Age through the Roman period. The Romans granted them civitas status and the town of Exeter (Isca Dumnoniorum) was their administrative centre.

Durotriges

The Durotriges (pronounced duro-tree-gays) Centred in Dorset, this people were also found in southern parts of Wiltshire and Somerset and western Dorset. This was a people that minted and used coins before the Roman Conquest, but there is no evidence from the coins or burials for a strong dynasty of kings. Rather, the Durotriges seem to have been a loosely knit confederation of smaller tribal groups at the time of the Roman conquest. One of these smaller tribal groups that lived around Dorchester, buried their dead in inhumation cemeteries. A unique feature of the Durotriges at this time was that they still occupied hillforts. Although hillforts are one of the most well-known features of the Iron Age, most were no longer occupied at the turn of the first millennium.

The best known of these Durotrigean hillforts is that of Maiden Castle near Dorchester, others include South Cadbury Castle and Hod Hill. The Durotriges did have some trading contacts with France. A major trading centre existed at Hengistbury Head from which cross-channel trade with Gaul was controlled. This may be the settlement called Dunium by Ptolemy. It was located on the border between the Durotriges and Atrebates. However, cross channel trade was not an important source of goods for the Durotriges, who preferred local products.

A particular type of pottery made at Poole Harbour was traded throughout the territory of the Durotriges. At the time of the Roman invasion the Durotriges put up a spirited if unsuccessful opposition, and they are almost certainly one of the two tribes that Suetonius records fighting against Vespasian and the 2nd legion. After the conquest, they were made into a civitas with their capital was at Durnovaria (Dorchester) in the mid-70’s. Later, a second Durotrigean civitas was created, administered from Lindinis (Ilchester).

Epidii

Little is known about this tribe. They lived in the modern region of Kintyre and probably the islands of Arran, Jura and Islay

Iceni

This was another tribe that issued coins before the Roman Conquest. Their coins and other archaeological evidence indicates that the tribe’s territory was in the modern counties of Norfolk and parts of Suffolk and Cambridgeshire. They appear to have been a wealthy and powerful group of tribes between 200 and 50 BC. From their territory come the finest hoards of gold treasure found in Iron Age Britain; the Snettisham Torc’s.

Other hoards of elaborately decorated bronze chariot fittings point to a love of conspicuous display by the nobles of the Iceni. This tribe also shunned contacts with the Roman world and the changes they brought with them that characterised the lifestyles of Catuvellauni and Trinovantes at this time. The Iceni had important religious centres at Snettisham and at Thetford. But when they were made into Roman Civitas, the Romans did not choose either of these centres, but the settlement at Caistor, near what is today Norwich.

Was this because the Iceni led the most successful revolt against Roman rule in the history of Roman Britain? When the Romans invaded southern Britain in AD 43, the Iceni were friendly towards the new rulers. Their king Prasutagus became a client-king of Rome. But on his death the kingdom was incorporated into the Roman province and, together with other abuses, led to the Icenian revolt led by Prasutagus’ widow, Queen Boudica.

Novantae

A little known tribe or people who lived in what is today south-west Scotland. The people living in this area did not build massive forts on the tops of mountains, as did the Votadini. Nor did the make many offerings of fine metal objects. Like their neighbours to the south, the Carvetii, archaeologists have found little evidence of the lives of these peoples before the Roman Conquest. They were clearly farmers and herders, but few of their farms and other settlements have been excavated by archaeologists so far.

Ordovices

This group covered much of the mountains and valleys of what is today mid-Wales. They were the northern neighbours of the Silures and the Southern neighbours of the Degeangli. Like the Silures and Degeangli, these peoples lived in small farms, often defended against attack. After the emperor Claudius invaded southern England in AD 43, one of the main leaders of the Britons, Caratacus, led his army to the Silures after his defeat on the Medway and the fall of his Capital, Camulodunum. Having raised forces with the Silures he travelled to the territory of the Ordovices and fought with them against the Roman’s in their push against Mona. He was defeated close to Newtown in 50AD. The Silures and the Ordovices remained unconquered for some time afterwards as the Roman’s were pre-occupied by other matters. The Roman general Agricola finally defeated the Ordovices in 77-8. The tribe was incorporated into Britannia and became a civitas (an administrative district).

Parisii

The Parisi lived in East Yorkshire. They had a tiny patch of territory which formed a Selby – Bridlington – Spurn Head triangle. The Parisii seemed to have their own unique culture for this part of Britain, having square burial enclosures, many containing chariot burials.

The Parisi share their name with the people who lived in France around what is today Paris. Whether both tribes shared strong links is hotly debated. Unlike other people living in Britain between about 300 and 100 BC, the people in East Yorkshire buried their dead in large cemeteries. This was much like the way many people in France and Germany buried their dead at the same time.

However, in other respects, the East Yorkshire Parisi lived in British style houses, wore British style ornaments and used British style pottery. At the time of the Romans, the Parisi had stopped burying their dead in this unusual way. However, they carried on other distinctive styles of life and remained separate from their large, powerful neighbours, the Brigantes. During the Roman advance into Brigantia in 70AD, the Parisii played an instrumental role, giving the IX legion an unmolested route via Brough up the eastern side of the country towards York. After the Roman Conquest, they were made into their own small civitas with their capital at Petuaria (modern Brough on Humber)

Regni

The Regni holds a special place in the history of Roman Britain. Under the leadership of Cogidubnus, it achieved the fastest level of Romanisation in Britain. By providing facilities for the Romans, and access to the harbour at Chichester, it gave Claudius a massive foot hold on the south coast. In return for this, Cogidubnus was given a magnificent palace at Fishbourne. There is some argument to suggest that the Roman arrival happened in this area, in the territory of a friendly king.

Selgovae

A British tribe of Scotland, the name is thought to mean ‘hunters’. The Roman geographer Ptolemy places them in the Southern uplands of Scotland. It is not clear from the little evidence we have as to exactly where these people lived. Some scholars place them in the upper Tweed Basin. It is unclear if they were part of the Votadini. They might have used Eildon Seat as their principal settlement. But this might have been a Votadinian site. Like the Votadini the Roman army in AD 79-80 conquered them.

Silures

Several Roman authors including Pliny, Ptolemy and Tacitus mention this tribe and later civitas (administrative unit in a Roman province). Their territory was south-east Wales – the Brecon Beacons and south Welsh valleys. A people of the mountains and valleys, we know relatively little about how they lived. Like the other tribes of the Welsh Mountains, they were difficult for the Romans to conquer and control.

For a time in the period around AD 45-57, they led the British opposition to the Roman advance westwards. Tacitus describes them as a strong and warlike nation, and for ten years or more the Romans fought to contain, rather than conquer them. Although defeated and occupied by the early 60s, their bitter resistance may explain the late grant of self-governing civitas status to them only in the early 2nd century. The capital was established at a previously unoccupied site at Caerwent and was given the name Venta Silurium.

Tacitus described them as swarthy and curly haired, and suggested their ancestors might be from Spain because of the similarities in appearance with some peoples in Spain. However, there is no evidence to suggest any genetic links between south Wales and parts of Spain.

Taexali

Little is known about this group who lived in what is today Grampian. They shared much with their neighbours, the Venicones to the south. These low-lying and fertile parts of eastern Scotland provide archaeological evidence for different types of settlement and rituals compared to those of the Highlands and Islands to the west and north. Brochs and Duns are not found here. People lived in small undefended farms and hamlets. The name Taexali is sometimes spelt Taezali. Either spelling is a very unusual name that is not recognisably of the same Celtic origins as other British tribal names. Although the Taexali were defeated by the Romans in AD 84, they were never permanently occupied. Like the Venicones and Caledones, they lived beyond the northernmost frontier of the Roman Empire; the Antonine Wall.

Trinovantes

The Trinovantes are the first British tribe to be mentioned by a Roman author, appearing in Caesar’s account of his invasion of 54 BC. Already at this early date, they seem to have been involved in a power struggle with the neighbouring tribes to the west who were to be forged into the kingdom of the Catuvellauni under Tasciovanus. This group shared the same ways of life and religious practices as the Catuvellauni and Cantiaci. They used coins, cremated their dead, ate from plates and drank from cups. They became part of the large kingdom established by the rules of the Catuvellauni.

The king Cunobelinus essentially absorbed the two tribes into one larger kingdom. He or his predecessors, established Colchester as a new royal site on the same model as St Albans. Colchester, the capital of the large kingdom, was the target for the Roman Emperor Claudius’ invasion in AD43. After the Roman Conquest, the Trinovantes were restored as a tribal entity in the form of a civitas (an administrative unit or county) within the new Roman Province. The capital of the civitas was the Roman city of Colchester, which was originally founded as a colony for retired Roman soldiers.

Venicones

This group lived in what is today Tayside. The Roman army campaigned several times in the territory of this people, but they were never permanently conquered and occupied. The archaeological evidence shows that this people and their northern neighbours, the Taexali, had much in common. The Venicones were one of the few groups in northern Britain at this time that buried their dead in stone lined graves. Graves and cremation burials were very rare in other parts of Britain before the Roman period. Archaeologists suspect people often practised complex funeral rituals in which bodies were naturally allowed to decompose. The Venicones and Taexali also made offerings of prestigious decorated locally made metal objects in bogs and lakes. Some of these offerings include massive bronze armlets. Each would weigh over 1.5 kg and were worn one on each arm. Only the Venicones and Taexali wore these unusual ornaments.

Votadini

This was a considerable tribe or people that lived in the south-east of Scotland. In the north, their territory started at Edinburgh and the Firth of Forth and stretched as far south as Northumberland in northern England. Where the boundary between the Votadini and the other large tribe, the Brigantes, who lived in northern England lay is not clear. It probably frequently shifted as a result of wars and as smaller tribes and communities changed allegiances. The Votadini, like the Brigantes, were a group made up of smaller tribes. We do not know the names of these smaller tribes and communities. Archaeologically, the territory of the Votadini was very different to that of either the Venicones or the Novantae. Large walls, banks and ditches surrounded most farms. People made offerings of fine metal objects, but never wore massive armlets.

There are also at least three considerable hillforts in their territory. Each was located on the top of a prominent hill or mountain. They may have been used for over a thousand years by this time as places of refuge and as places for meetings for political and religious ceremonies. These hillforts were at Yeavering Bell, Eildon Seat and Traprain Law. The Votadini were conquered and occupied by the Roman Army in AD 79-80.

Brigantes God Belatucadros

Brigantia votive inscriptions – Finds and Analysis

Contents [hide]

Roman Altar Inscriptions to Brigantia

Goddess Brigantia

Votive inscriptions to the Goddess Brigantia have been found in the North of England using four names: Caelestis Brigantia, Nympha Brigantia, Brigantia Augusta, and Victoria Brigantia. In this report I review what is known about them, and how this knowledge can help us understand how the Romano-British viewed the Goddess.

Adel: Altar by Cingetissa. RIB 630

The Goddess Brigantia

The Goddess Brigantia

Birrens: Figure in gabled relief by Amandus arcitectus. RIB 2091 (49) (Above image)

South Shields: Altar by Congeniccus. RIB 1053

Bath: There is a curse tablet dedicated to A God called Bregneus, which has been loosely equated with the Brigantes and Brigantia

Caelestis Brigantia

Corbridge: Altar by G. Julius Apolinaris, centurion of VI Victrix, his name, rank and unit replacing someone else’s or else recarved to make a correction. RIB 1131 (with Jupiter Aeternus Dolichenus and Salus). See also Brit. xxvi (1995), 380, no. 7 for another possibility.

Nympha Brigantia

Castlesteads(?): Altar to Nympha Brigantia in honour of Caracalla and his divine house by M. Cocceius Nigrinus, [pr]oc(urator) Aug(usti) n(ostri), ‘procurator of our Emperor’, between 212-17. RIB 2066 (with Domus Divina)

Victoria Brigantia (Victorious Brigantia)

Castleford: Altar by Aurelius Senopianus. RIB 628

Greetland: Altar by T. Aurelius Aurelianus, magister sacrorum, in 208. RIB 627 (with Numina Augustorum)

Brigantia Augusta

Slack: There is a Altar dedicated to Bregans, currently interpreted as representing a male aspect of Brigantia. But it is tenuous without further evidence.

Discussion regarding the implications of the names used for Brigantia

The variations of the names used for Brigantia in Roman inscriptions—such as Caelestis Brigantia, Nympha Brigantia, Brigantia Augusta, and Victoria Brigantia—reflect the complex syncretism between the native Celtic goddess Brigantia and the Roman pantheon, alongside shifts in religious and imperial ideology. These variations offer insights into how the Romans adapted and integrated local deities within their own religious frameworks, often reshaping or aligning them with Roman concepts.

Here is a breakdown of the implications of these different titles:

Caelestis Brigantia

Meaning: Caelestis means “heavenly” or “celestial” in Latin. This title for Brigantia aligns her with the Roman concept of the divine celestial sphere, suggesting that she was associated with the sky, the heavens, or divine power, which is a common Roman attribute given to various gods.

Implication: This title indicates a higher, possibly more abstract or universal role for Brigantia, aligning her with celestial or sky deities like Juno Caelestis (the Roman “Heavenly Juno”). It may reflect her transformation into a more Romanized or cosmopolitan deity, one that could be worshiped not only in specific local contexts but also in broader Roman religious practices. By emphasizing her “heavenly” nature, it elevates Brigantia from a local tribal goddess to a more universal divine figure, potentially linked to Roman imperial aspirations.

Nympha Brigantia

Meaning: Nympha refers to a type of female spirit or deity associated with nature, often linked to rivers, trees, and forests in Greek and Roman traditions. By using this title, Brigantia may be associated with natural, liminal spaces.

Implication: The title Nympha connects Brigantia with the ancient, elemental spirits of nature and suggests a more localized, nature-based role. This connection could have been particularly appealing in Roman Britain, where natural places such as rivers, forests, and springs were sacred to both the native peoples and the Romans. The term Nympha Brigantia might suggest that, in certain contexts, she was revered in more intimate, pastoral settings. It could also indicate a more nurturing, life-giving aspect of her character, emphasizing fertility and nature rather than warfare or victory, which are typically associated with Roman goddesses like Victoria.

Brigantia Augusta

Meaning: Augusta is a title used by Roman emperors and empresses, meaning “venerable” or “majestic,” and signifying imperial divinity or elevated status. The title Brigantia Augusta might imply that Brigantia was being equated with imperial power or was being revered as a goddess of the imperial family.

Implication: The use of Augusta implies that Brigantia had been elevated in status to a level befitting the imperial cult, perhaps as a patroness of the emperor or empire. This could indicate a shift towards state-sponsored religious practices where local deities were integrated into the imperial cult. The title might suggest an imperial policy of incorporating regional deities into the Roman pantheon as a way of legitimizing imperial rule by presenting the emperor as the earthly representative of the gods, with Brigantia acting as a supporter or protector of the empire.

Note: This extrapolation is made in the knowledge that the evidence to support this name suggestion, is reasonably tenuous.

Victoria Brigantia

Meaning: Victoria is the Roman goddess of victory, often depicted as a winged figure, symbolizing success in war and conquest. The title Victoria Brigantia combines the Celtic goddess Brigantia with the Roman concept of victory.

Implication: This fusion points to a Romanization of Brigantia, aligning her with the Roman goddess of victory. The combination likely reflects the role of Brigantia in the local religious system and her association with triumph, which was of great importance in Roman military culture. It suggests that Brigantia was viewed as not just a protector of the local tribes but also as a deity who could bring success and victory in battle, aligning her role with Roman imperial ideals. This shift might have been used to enhance the legitimacy of Roman power in the region, where victory was a central theme in both military and cultural contexts.

General Implications

Syncretism: These various names reflect the Roman practice of syncretism, where Roman deities and local gods were blended. The changing titles of Brigantia show how local deities were adapted to Roman religious ideas, incorporating elements of Roman imperial culture, nature spirits, and celestial powers.

Regional Variations: The choice of different titles might indicate regional or local preferences in how Brigantia was understood and worshiped. Different communities might have emphasized aspects of Brigantia that aligned with their specific needs—whether for victory in battle, protection in nature, or association with the imperial cult.

Elevation of Brigantia: Over time, the use of titles like Caelestis and Augusta reflects Brigantia’s elevation from a local Celtic goddess to a more cosmopolitan figure, one who could be worshiped in the broader Roman religious context, and even connected with the emperor’s divine authority.

Adaptation for Roman Worship: The Romans were skilled at adapting local gods into their pantheon, giving them Roman qualities and associating them with Roman virtues like victory, power, and imperial glory. This approach allowed for smoother integration of local populations into the Roman Empire, as it was easier for them to accept imperial authority when it was seen as consistent with their own deities.

Brigantia as a Triple Goddess and the Symbolism of Three-in-One

You may have a notion that Brigantia is a triple goddess, yet here we see four names applied to Brigantia here. From my work in spiritual circles. I understand that a collection of spirits that work together in unison form another, highest version of that archetype – The one that embodies all three. This notion is often lost in our interpretations. But here, it makes quite a great deal of sense. Let me explain:

In Celtic traditions, Brigantia is often conceptualized as a Triple Goddess, a deity represented by three distinct but interconnected aspects. This concept of the triple deity is a common motif in many cultures, reflecting a unity of three forces or manifestations that work together to form a singular, potent divine entity. The three faces or aspects can represent different parts of the goddess’s nature, like:

  • Brigantia as a Warrior (the protector, the one associated with victory, success, and war),
    Brigantia as a Healer or Nurturer (the life-giving, creative, and nurturing aspect),
    Brigantia as a Wise or Prophetic figure (the teacher, the spiritual guide, the connection with the ancestors).

In this context, the Triple Goddess is more than just three separate roles; it’s a powerful spiritual unity of complementary energies, as well as a model for understanding the cyclical nature of life, death, and rebirth.

Augusta as the Symbolic One: The Hidden Fourth

Now, when one considers the idea of Brigantia Augusta—”Augusta” being a title often conferred upon the imperial gods, elevating them to a divine and revered status—the concept of a “hidden fourth” begins to make more sense. In this case, Brigantia Augusta could be seen as representing the symbolic, unifying force that binds the three aspects of Brigantia into a single, divine whole.

The term Augusta in Roman contexts denotes something venerable, majestic, or worthy of imperial respect. In the Roman imperial cult, the emperor was often associated with the divine and referred to as Divus Augustus, symbolizing the unity of all Roman virtues. By giving Brigantia the title of Augusta, the Romans may have been elevating her to the role of a supreme, unified force that transcends her individual aspects.

Brigantia Augusta may not only signify a singular divine form of Brigantia but also symbolically embody the concept of the three-in-one. She is the fourth, the invisible force that holds the other three aspects together. This “hidden fourth” could represent a deeper, more esoteric quality, such as the unity of body, mind, and spirit, or perhaps the balance between life, death, and rebirth, the cyclical nature of existence—concepts inherent in Triple Goddess imagery.

This aligns with the mystery religions and certain esoteric traditions in the Roman world, where the fourth element often symbolized wholeness, completion, or the divine unity that is beyond visible comprehension. The idea of a “hidden fourth” is also seen in other mythological systems, like the fourth dimension or the invisible axis that supports the visible three.

Hierarchy within Roman Gods

In terms of where these deities sit in the hierarchy of Roman gods, we can look at the Roman pantheon and see how the titles and attributes of Brigantia align with different categories of divinity.

Victoria Brigantia: Victoria, the Roman goddess of victory, was important in military contexts and could be considered among the major deities when it came to military and imperial triumphs. Placing Brigantia alongside Victoria could elevate her to a powerful, imperial status, especially in contexts where military conquest or imperial success was a key focus.

Caelestis Brigantia: The title Caelestis suggests a higher divine status, linking Brigantia to the heavenly or celestial sphere. This would place her among the more universally revered deities—those associated with the heavens or divine forces that transcend specific, localized religious practices. She could be seen as akin to gods like Juno Caelestis or Sol Invictus, who were worshipped for their broader, celestial powers.

Nympha Brigantia: As Nympha, Brigantia is perhaps relegated to the lower levels of the pantheon, aligning her with nature spirits or deities of specific places (rivers, trees, springs). Nymphs in the Roman system were considered minor deities or spirits connected to nature. This aspect might be seen as Brigantia’s more earthy and local manifestation, perhaps more accessible to the people but still significant in the broader spiritual landscape.

Brigantia Augusta: As Augusta, Brigantia would be among the imperial deities, occupying a position of reverence and authority akin to that of Roman gods like Apollo or Minerva, who were associated with both the state and the imperial family. In the context of imperial cults, a deity with the title Augusta is elevated to the highest ranks of divine veneration, suggesting that Brigantia’s imperial status was key to her acceptance within Roman society. We do, however, need to take care to bear in mind the evidence for this appellation is the weakest.

The Hidden Fourth in a Broader Context

The idea of a “hidden fourth” is not just an interesting theological speculation but also a potentially transformative aspect of how we understand the process of the Romanization of local Celtic deities. The Romans were adept at reinterpreting and reshaping local religious systems, which included not only integrating deities into their pantheon but also elevating them by giving them imperial titles like Augusta and Caelestis. In a sense, the Romans could have re-envisioned Brigantia as not just a Celtic deity but as a figure capable of embodying Roman virtues like imperial strength, military success, and cosmic power—all of which could be expressed through her hidden, unifying essence that encompasses both the three and the one.

Brigantia Augusta may be seen as the force that holds these aspects of Caelestis, Nympha, and Victoria together, representing the unifying divine essence that transcends individual forms. This interpretation could help us understand better, and see triple goddesses as actually being capable of understood to be the three, embodied within the one, in their most potent form.

The Birrens Statue of Brigantia: Are we seeing the full picture?

The Birrens statue was discovered at the Roman fort of Birrens, located in Scotland. It is a marble statue that depicts Brigantia, the Celtic goddess, in a form that incorporates Roman imperial iconography. It’s possibly Britain’s most important statue relating to the Goddess Britannia, As it seems to show her as some kind of equivalent local deity as Juno, plus a number of other Goddesses and levels of divine power. This is intriguing, as there seems to be little or no evidence of any female deity elsewhere being potentially paid this kind of honour.

However, I have to remind myself to keep my cool, remember I don’t really know anything, and take a look at the scant evidence, and what I dare extrapolate from it. Remember, I am no professional. I love making connections, looking that bit deeper. It’s part of the process to jump to a premature conclusion or two, just so they can be proven wrong later, and maybe, in so doing shed a little extra light on the subject.

Sometimes academic sources, can be difficult to navigate or too technical to understanding at first pass. Most people do not have the time to sift through sources and work out the cryptic meaning to the some commentary or report data itself, never mind it’s voracity. This was the case when I first tried to dig into the reasoning behind the current accepted interpretation of the Birrens Statue inscription:

“Sacred to Brigantia: Amandus, the engineer, by command fulfilled the order.”

On the surface, this sounds simple enough, but as always, I wanted to check the original source – What was the original Latin? I could not find this. But I did spot this discussion about the translation:

“imp · i, Clerk, suggesting imp(eratoris) I(uliani); imp · i, Hors., suggesting as an alternative imp(endit); imp · i, McCaul, suggesting imp(erante) i(psa) or [n]imp(hae) i(psius); im͡p · i, Gord. in pl.; imp, Grotefend, conj. i{m}p(sius); Henzen conj. imp(ensa) [s(va)] and quoting Mommsen’s conj. imp(eratum) [f(ecit)], which Hueb. accepts with reserve. imp, : The splayed m, at first ligatured to p, was corrected to imp. This can hardly be expanded as imp(eratoris), for the emperor would be cited as Aug(usti). It seems best to take it as imp(eratum fecit). In Germany dedications to the Matronae use the phrase ex imperio ipsarum (CIL xiii 7904, 7905, 7906, 7925), so imp. may have been mistakenly drafted for ips(ius) the command will have come from the goddess R.P.W.”

Now I’m no expert on Latin, but what jumped out at me, was that the term “IMP I” seems to have been in the original text, but was no longer mentioned, either in the translation, or in a sidenote stating that it had been removed, and why, in plain English. So people like me can understand. Especially when the reference links include 70 year old Latin documents.

I could also see, that although they had referenced German Matronae inscriptions, they did not seem to have reviewed either the context of the inscription itself: The Birrens Statue. Neither had they referenced the other Roman Brigantia inscriptions. 

I therefore decided to see what I could do to decipher this commentary, and retest those assumptions, including the symbolic meaning of the status itself, and the evidence from the other inscriptions. Plus a look at how this potentially new conclusion fits with Roman interactions with local deities fits with evidence from elsewhere.

Given that the visual symbolism of the Birrens statue must be central to the debate regarding the supporting context to the inscription, it’s surprising that this, in the least, was not mentioned. The discussion focused more on the inscription itself, leaving out important contextual details like the apparent Orb she is holding, along with a spear. These are all potential symbols of great power. Yet, this debate seems to have concluded that the Romans made a mistake, and ended up repeating a daily comedy of errors as they accidentally honoured Brigantia as potentially, the sacred consort of their emperor.

Let’s review the Birrens Statue

Objects in the Statue

  • Spear: The spear in the Birrens statue is a symbol commonly associated with both military power and authority. This is consistent with the idea of Brigantia being depicted as a protector and warrior figure. The spear was often used in Roman military iconography, symbolizing leadership and power, particularly in depictions of gods and goddesses connected to victory and protection (similar to Minerva, the Roman goddess of wisdom and warfare, who was depicted holding a spear). The Spear is also an important symbol of power for the local Iron Age people, as can be seen in such deities as Lugh. 

  • Orb: Brigantia seems to be holding a Orb parallels the Orb held by modern monarchs, and historically, those who held a Orb were understood to possess divine or inherited authority. The Orb symbolizes the right to rule, and its connection to Brigantia ties her to a higher authority—that of the Roman Empire. In this way, Brigantia could be seen as not only a local goddess but also a divinely sanctioned figure whose power could protect and legitimize Roman rule in the Britannic territories. Either that, or we should see other Goddesses, not linked to Brigantia but having similar status, recognised in their local area.

The Role of Symbols in Roman Imperial Cult

In the Roman context, the spear and laurel wreath are imperial symbols closely tied to the imperial cult and military victory. This type of iconography on local deities like Brigantia would have been part of the Romanization of local gods. The Romans often adopted and adapted native deities, blending them with their own pantheon, and this would include military symbols as part of the imperial cult to integrate local gods into the broader Roman imperial structure.

  • Spear: The spear also represents military power. Roman gods associated with war, like Mars and Minerva, were often depicted holding a spear, a symbol of their authority in battle. Brigantia, shown with a spear, aligns her with these Roman military deities, further reinforcing her role as a protector and warrior goddess within the Roman imperial framework.
  • The orb (or globus in Latin) is a powerful symbol of imperial power in Rome and has a deep and evolving significance, both in Roman culture and in later periods, such as the Byzantine Empire and medieval monarchies. The orb itself, typically depicted as a spherical object held by emperors or other sovereigns, is associated with the idea of universal dominion, sovereignty, and cosmic order. The orb in Roman imperial iconography was frequently seen in depictions of the emperor, often in the hand of the emperor alongside other symbols of power, such as the sceptre or globe. Its significance evolved as a symbol of Roman authority, but the core symbolism remains tied to the concept of universal rule and divine legitimacy.

The Orb in Roman Imperial Power

The Orb as a Symbol of Universal Dominion

  • The orb was frequently used as a symbol of the emperor’s sovereignty over the known world, particularly as Rome expanded its territory. The orb signifies the emperor’s rule over the Earth, encompassing the entire known world, which was considered to be under the emperor’s control.
  • This aligns with the imperial ideology that Rome, under the emperor, ruled over the entire known universe, and the orb symbolized the totality of imperial power.

The Orb and the Concept of the Cosmos

  • The orb also carried a cosmic significance. In Roman thought, the universe was often depicted as a sphere, a perfect shape that symbolized the harmonious order of the cosmos. Therefore, the orb in the hands of the emperor was also a reflection of his role as the divine guarantor of cosmic order.
  • This connection between the orb and the cosmos would eventually influence later depictions of kings and emperors in the Christianized Byzantine Empire and medieval Europe, where the orb became a symbol not only of earthly dominion but also of the emperor’s role as a defender of divine order and God’s earthly representative.

The Orb and Roman Imperial Iconography

  • The orb was often depicted alongside other imperial symbols. For instance, in Roman coins and sculptures, emperors are shown holding a sceptre in one hand and an orb in the other, signifying their combined authority over the military (sceptre) and the entire world (orb). This dual symbolism underscores the emperor’s role as both a military leader and a universal sovereign.
  • The orb often appeared in representations of Augustus, Tiberius, and other emperors, emphasizing the idea of Roman world dominance. Over time, the orb became associated with imperial power itself, symbolizing the emperor’s authority over the empire.

Confirmation from Archaeological and Historical Studies

  • Brigantia’s Role in Roman Britain: As a local Celtic goddess, Brigantia was traditionally associated with protection, wisdom, and victory. After the Roman conquest of Britain, the Romans often syncretized local deities with their own pantheon. Brigantia’s association with victory and warfare through the laurel wreath and spear indicates her adaptation to the Roman religious framework, especially in relation to the imperial cult. This type of religious fusion is a characteristic feature of the Roman practice of interpretatio Romana, where local gods were associated with Roman deities to help integrate the local population into the Roman system.

  • Romanization of Local Deities: Romanization often involved the use of Roman symbols to elevate local deities. In the case of Brigantia, her adoption of imperial symbols can be seen as a way of giving her a broader, imperial significance, aligning her with the power and authority of the Roman Empire. Roman deities like Victoria (the goddess of victory) were central to the imperial cult, and the laurel wreath was a symbol used to represent imperial triumph. Brigantia’s use of such symbols places her within this context.

In the statue of Brigantia from Birrens, the objects she holds are pivotal in interpreting her symbolism:

Connection to Royal Symbols of Power

The objects in the Birrens statue—the spear and the orb—have clear parallels with symbols seen in the royal symbols of power, both in ancient times and in more modern settings. The spear, as a symbol of military authority and protection, directly connects Brigantia to concepts of sovereignty and leadership, much like how a monarch’s orb symbolize their right to rule.

  • Sovereignty and Power: Much like how modern royal families use symbols such as the crown (a sign of rulership and divinity), Orbs (symbols of control and governance), and the spear in Brigantia’s iconography position her as an authoritative figure whose power transcends her local tribal roots.

  • Brigantia as a Higher Authority: The Orb is often used in royal iconography to symbolize the monarch’s divine right to rule. In both ancient and modern depictions of monarchs, the Orb signifies the sovereign’s authority and the divine or hereditary power they hold. The Orb is used by many ancient gods and goddesses as a symbol of their sovereignty and control over certain domains. For instance, in Greek and Roman mythology, gods like Jupiter is often depicted holding a Orb, signifying his governance over both the heavens and the earth.

The Symbolism of the Statue vs. the “IMP” Debate

The Birrens statue of Brigantia is a significant artifact that has been the subject of scholarly discussion, particularly concerning its iconography and the associated inscription. The statue depicts Brigantia holding a Orb and laurel wreath, symbols traditionally linked to imperial authority and victory. This portrayal suggests a syncretism between Brigantia and Roman deities such as Minerva and Victoria, reflecting the Romanization of local Celtic beliefs.

The inscription on the statue, which includes the title “IMP” (Imperator), has been a focal point of debate. Some scholars interpret this as an indication of Brigantia’s association with imperial power, while others view it as a standard honorific title. This debate underscores the complexities in understanding the extent of Roman influence on local deities and the nuances of religious syncretism in Roman Britain.

Breakdown of the Commentary

The commentary discussed earlier in relation to the interpretation of “IMP”, shows a series of interpretations regarding the abbreviation “IMP” and how it might be expanded. These interpretations are essential to understanding the inscription’s meaning and how it relates to the use of imperial symbols in the statue. Let’s break down the possibilities mentioned:

  1. imp(eratoris) I(uliani) – This suggestion ties “IMP” to Imperator (a military title) and could reference Julius, possibly Julius Caesar or another figure. However, this interpretation would be unusual, as emperors are typically cited with their imperial title (Aug(usti)), rather than just “IMP”.

  2. imp(endit) – This suggestion proposes IMP as part of the verb impendo, meaning “to dedicate” or “to make a vow.” This would imply that Brigantia or another divine figure is being dedicated or venerated, but this is somewhat disconnected from the Roman imperial context.

  3. imp(erante) i(psa) – Here, the suggestion is that “IMP” could be expanded to “imperante ipsa”, meaning “the ruling goddess herself.” This interpretation aligns with the idea that Brigantia, as the divine protector, may have been associated with imperial authority or even military leadership in her own right.

  4. imp(hae) i(psius) – This conjecture suggests IMP could stand for “imp(hae) ipsius”, referring to the command or will of the goddess herself. This interpretation hints that Brigantia is directly responsible for the dedication and, by extension, for the imperial connection. This could imply she was intervening on behalf of the imperial power, in keeping with the protective and sovereign role she plays in the statue’s iconography.

  5. imp(ensa) [s(va)] – This interpretation, which seems to be quoting Mommsen, suggests IMP could refer to “impensa”, meaning “expense” or “tribute.” In this case, it could refer to the dedication of a statue or altar, possibly funded by the imperial treasury or as part of the imperial system.

  6. imperatum – This suggests IMP could be shorthand for “imperatum”, meaning “commanded” or “ordered.” This might imply that the dedication was made under imperial command, reflecting the imperial connection but without directly associating the goddess with imperial status. Henzen’s suggestion of “imperatum fecit” might indicate that the dedication was completed under imperial authority.

Conclusion on the “IMP” Debate

  • “IMP” as “imperatum fecit” seems to be the most widely accepted interpretation. This suggests that the dedication was commanded or sanctioned by imperial authority, which aligns with Brigantia’s role as a divine protector of Roman military power.
  • “IMP” as part of the word “imperante” or “ipsius” could indicate that Brigantia herself was perceived as holding imperial authority, which ties into her depiction in the statue with imperial symbols like the Orb.

The interpretations show that scholars are still grappling with the meaning of “IMP”, and it’s evident that there’s some ambiguity in how to expand it. The fact that Brigantia is depicted with a symbol of imperial sovereignty (Orb) suggests a strong connection between her and Roman imperial power, which may or may not be directly tied to the “IMP” in the inscription. However, it’s clear that the imperial link is a key part of the interpretation and understanding of Brigantia’s role in Roman Britain.

A New Interpretive Understanding

Given the additional context of other inscriptions where Brigantia is associated with the title of Augusta, I would lean towards the interpretation that “IMP” in the Birrens inscription likely refers to “imperatum”, meaning “commanded” or “ordered,” and signifies that the dedication was made under imperial authority.

Here’s why:

Brigantia as “Augusta”

The title “Augusta”, as has been proposed to have been applied to Brigantia, and this new acceptance of the legitimacy of the IMP appellation strengthens one’s confidence that The Goddess Brigantia was also known as Augustus, as previously suggested. Acceptance of the IMP title implies that Brigantia had been elevated to a divine, imperial status within the Roman religious system. The title of Augusta was typically reserved for goddesses associated with imperial power, either as direct consorts of the emperor or as powerful deities who were closely tied to the imperial cult.

In the case of Brigantia, having the Augusta title suggests that she was seen as a high-ranking deity whose role was linked to imperial triumphs and victories. This would align with her depiction in the Birrens statue holding imperial symbols like the Orb and laurel wreath. These symbols are traditionally linked with sovereignty, military command, and victory, which reinforce her role as a protector of Roman rule and a figure of imperial authority.

“IMP” as “imperatum”

If we consider “IMP” as “imperatum” (“commanded” or “ordered”), it fits with the idea that the dedication of the statue or altar was made under imperial authority—in other words, the act of dedicating the statue to Brigantia was sanctioned or ordered by the emperor or imperial representatives. This interpretation would be consistent with Brigantia’s role as a divine figure within the imperial system, similar to other Roman deities who were either incorporated into the imperial cult or venerated as figures that legitimized Roman power.

This interpretation also seems plausible when considering the context of Romanization. As a goddess associated with victory and divine imperial rule, Brigantia would likely have been worshipped not only for local protection but also for her role in supporting the emperor. The phrase “imperatum” would reinforce her association with Roman imperial authority, and it would make sense to consider the dedication of her altar as being sanctioned by imperial command.

Imperial Symbols in the Statue

The fact that Brigantia is depicted with a Orb and laurel wreath in the Birrens statue suggests that her image and role were directly tied to imperial symbolism. These objects were used to signify Roman authority—the Orb is a symbol of sovereignty, and the laurel wreath is linked to victory and triumph. This fits well with the idea that the inscription “IMP” refers to the dedication being made with imperial sanction rather than to Brigantia herself being considered as “imperator” (commander) in a direct military sense.

Context of the Title “Augusta”:

The title of “Augusta” used in the  Slack Inscription further supports this idea. It is unlikely that Brigantia, as a local Celtic goddess, was seen as an “empress” or a military commander on the same level as the Roman emperor. Rather, her imperial title would reflect her role as a divine figure in the imperial cult—a symbol of imperial power and protection. Therefore, “imperatum” in the Birrens inscription likely refers to the imperial command to dedicate the altar to her, rather than an indication of Brigantia holding the title of “imperator” herself.

How Common is it for a local deity to have IMP within their Inscription?

In Roman Britain, the abbreviation “IMP” (Imperator) is so far exclusively associated with Brigantia, as seen in the Birrens inscription.

What about IMP Inscriptions Elsewhere?

Based on the current sources and research available to me, “IMP” is not typically used in inscriptions referring to goddesses like Isis, Artemis, Cybele, or the Matronae in the same way it appears in the Birrens inscription for Brigantia. This could be an area where more research may surface additional examples, but as of now, there is no strong evidence of these other goddesses commonly being associated with “IMP” in a similar fashion.

Interestingly, no IMP inscriptions appear to have been found for any of the female deities in Rome, as far as I can ascertain. Does that increase the likelihood of it being a mistake?

Given this rarity, is this likely to have been a mistake?

Given the significance of the Birrens inscription, the importance of its location, and the fact that it was likely used regularly by many people, it seems highly unlikely that the use of “IMP” in this context was a mistake that was overlooked or ignored by the authorities.

Here are several reasons why it is more plausible that the use of “IMP” was deliberate and meaningful:

Public and Ritual Importance of Inscriptions

  • Inscriptions in the Roman world, particularly those found in public places or within military contexts (like a fort in Roman Britain), were often carefully considered and crafted with attention to correct symbolism. They were used for public display, often to communicate messages about imperial power, military victories, or religious devotion.
  • If an inscription was to be permanent or displayed in a prominent location, it would have been reviewed and authorized by individuals in positions of authority. Given the strategic importance of the Birrens fort, the inscription would likely have been seen by those in charge—military commanders or local Roman officials—and could have easily been corrected if there was any doubt about its accuracy.

Deliberate Syncretism and Imperial Messaging

  • The Roman Empire was meticulous in its religious messaging, particularly when it came to integrating local deities like Brigantia into the imperial cult. The use of “IMP” (Imperator) alongside Brigantia could have been a deliberate effort to elevate her from a local deity to a divine protector of Roman power—very much in line with the Roman strategy of assimilating local deities into the imperial structure.
  • Given Brigantia’s evident association with military victory and Roman sovereignty, especially through her depiction with imperial symbols like the sceptre and laurel wreath, it’s very likely that the use of “IMP” was a strategic decision to link her with imperial authority. It would make sense that Roman officials would be aware of this choice and would approve of it as part of the Romanization process in Britain.

No Evidence of Correction or Objection

  • In Roman times, inaccuracies in inscriptions, particularly those associated with imperial titles, were not easily ignored. The Roman military and administrative structures were incredibly organized, and any errors, especially those concerning titles like Imperator (which had specific connotations regarding the emperor’s authority), would typically have been corrected quickly.
  • Moreover, there are no records or evidence of anyone in the Roman military or political structure objecting to or correcting the inscription. If it had been a mistake, especially one involving the “IMP” title, it would likely have been addressed by the local authorities—either by rewriting the inscription or by issuing a correction elsewhere.

The Role of Brigantia in Roman Britain

  • Brigantia was clearly an important figure in Roman Britain, and her role as a goddess associated with victory and protection of the empire would have been well understood by both the military and local populace. Given her prominent position within the Roman religious framework in Britain, her association with imperial power would have been purposeful and intended to communicate the connection between local and imperial power.
  • The imperial symbol on her altar, which connects her to the emperor’s power, would not have been a mistake. Instead, it reflects the growing integration of local deities into the Roman system, particularly in the provinces.

Symbolism and Long-Term Impact

  • The inscription will  displayed publicly and was not just for one-time or private use. It was intended to affirm the presence of Roman authority and legitimize the emperor’s power within the local religious context. Any mistake or inconsistency in such an inscription would likely have been noticed quickly by the public, especially if it affected the perception of imperial power.
  • Therefore, the use of “IMP” in this context, particularly in association with Brigantia as a figure of imperial power, would have been carefully managed and seen as a calculated act.

Unlikely to Be a Mistake

The chances that the use of “IMP” in the Birrens inscription was a mistake that was overlooked or ignored by everyone in power are extremely low. Given the strategic importance of the inscription, the role of Brigantia as a protector of Roman power, and the highly organized nature of Roman military and administrative practices, it seems much more likely that the use of “IMP” was a deliberate decision meant to highlight Brigantia’s elevated status as part of the Roman imperial system.

Rather than being an error, it was likely an intentional choice to position Brigantia as a divine protector of imperial rule, symbolizing her authority and connection to Roman power in Britain.

Other Female Deities with Orbs

There are instances in Roman art and imperial iconography where female deities are depicted holding an orb or objects with orb-like symbolism. These examples reflect the importance of the orb as a symbol of sovereignty, cosmic order, and imperial authority, which were sometimes attributed to female deities, particularly those associated with victory, protection, and cosmic order. However, it’s important to note that while the orb was more frequently depicted with male rulers or gods, female deities also appeared with the orb in specific symbolic contexts.

Minerva

  • Minerva, the Roman goddess of wisdom, warfare, and crafts, is sometimes depicted holding the orb in representations that emphasize her role in defending or protecting the cosmic order. As a deity closely linked to the emperor and the imperial cult, she could be shown holding the orb as a symbol of her sovereignty over wisdom and her divine role in maintaining cosmic harmony.
  • In some Roman coins and sculptures, Minerva is shown holding both the spear and the orb, signalling her military and intellectual authority, as well as her divine protection of Rome and the empire.

Victoria

  • While Victoria is more commonly shown with symbols of victory (such as a palm branch or wreath), there are instances where she is depicted holding an orb. These depictions symbolize her role as a goddess of imperial victory and cosmic power, often in conjunction with her association with the emperor’s triumphs.
  • The orb in Victoria’s hand can represent her role in the emperor’s divine legitimacy—just as the emperor holds an orb to signify his rule over the empire, so too does Victoria hold it as a symbol of imperial success.

Cybele (Mater Deum)

  • Cybele, the Great Mother goddess, was a deity widely worshipped in the Roman Empire, especially in the eastern provinces. She was often depicted holding the orb as a symbol of her cosmic power and authority. As a mother goddess associated with both fertility and protection, Cybele’s connection to the orb emphasized her role in maintaining cosmic order and providing sovereignty over the world.
  • The orb also symbolized her role as a protector of the Roman state, and the orb in her iconography could serve as a representation of her protection of the imperial order, particularly during times of military expansion and conquest.

Roma

  • Roma, the personification of the city of Rome, was often depicted as a powerful female deity holding the orb. In some of her depictions, Roma is shown as a warrior goddess, holding both a spear and an orb. The orb, in this case, represents Rome’s dominion over the known world—her rule over the empire.
  • The orb in Roma’s depictions symbolizes not only the sovereignty of the city of Rome but also its role as the centre of imperial power and as the foundation of the Roman Empire’s cosmic authority.

Ceres

  • Ceres, the goddess of agriculture and fertility, is sometimes depicted with an orb in later Roman depictions. While she is more commonly shown with wheat or cornucopia, the orb in some depictions emphasizes her role in the abundance and control over the earth and the cyclical nature of agriculture, symbolizing her sovereignty over the natural world.
  • The orb here may also carry a cosmic or divine governance symbolism, suggesting her control over the earth’s fertility and the cosmic forces that govern it.

Summary: Female Deities and the Orb

  • Minerva: The orb in Minerva’s depictions emphasizes her role in protecting cosmic order and possibly her connection to imperial authority.
  • Victoria: While more commonly associated with victory symbols, she occasionally holds the orb as a representation of her role in imperial success.
  • Cybele: The orb symbolizes her cosmic power and her role as a protector of imperial rule.
  • Roma: The orb in Roma’s depictions represents her dominion over the empire and imperial sovereignty.
  • Ceres: The orb in Ceres’ depictions suggests divine control over the natural world and cosmic order.

In these examples, female deities holding the orb are often associated with cosmic authority or imperial power, though it is more typical for male rulers or gods to be depicted with the orb. However, as the deities themselves often represented forces that governed imperial sovereignty (like victory, fertility, cosmic order, and protection), it is not surprising that female deities were depicted holding the orb in representations of their divine rule and guardianship over these powers.

 Analysis of the Orb Position

The hand with which deities hold the orb can carry subtle symbolic significance, especially in the context of Roman iconography, where the position and symbolism of each object were carefully considered.

Analysing of Which Hand the Orb is Held With

Minerva:

  • Positioning: Minerva is often depicted holding the orb in her left hand, while her right hand typically holds a spear or olive branch.
  • Interpretation: The left hand holding the orb could symbolize the cosmic and intellectual domain over which Minerva rules, as the left hand was often associated with the passive, receptive side, representing wisdom, reason, and divine protection. The right hand, which is more often shown in active poses (such as holding the spear), might symbolize the military and active role of the goddess. This positioning reflects Minerva’s dual nature as both a goddess of wisdom and warfare.

Victoria:

  • Positioning: Victoria is generally depicted holding the orb in her left hand, with her right hand either raised in a gesture of blessing or holding a palm branch, both symbols of victory.
  • Interpretation: Like Minerva, the orb in the left hand of Victoria may emphasize her role as a cosmic or divine protector of victory, while the right hand (usually in the gesture of triumph) reinforces the active victory and empirical achievement associated with imperial triumphs. This positioning associates the right hand with action, while the left hand symbolizes cosmic order and victory’s divine backing.

Cybele:

  • Positioning: Cybele is often depicted holding the orb in her right hand, with her left hand sometimes resting on a lion or a throne, or in some cases, holding a cornucopia.
  • Interpretation: Holding the orb in the right hand may signify active rule, power, and sovereignty. As Cybele is the goddess of the earth and fertility, her right hand holding the orb indicates dominion over nature and the empire’s protection, tying her to imperial authority and the cosmic balance she represents.

Roma:

  • Positioning: Roma is depicted holding the orb in her left hand, while her right hand often holds a spear or is in a gesture of salutation.
  • Interpretation: Like Victoria, Roma’s holding the orb in her left hand may reflect her cosmic sovereignty over the empire, while her right hand, associated with action (holding a spear or making a salutation), symbolizes Roman military power and the active defence of the empire. The orb represents her worldly and cosmic power as the embodiment of the Roman state.

Ceres:

  • Positioning: Ceres is sometimes depicted holding the orb in her left hand, with her right hand holding a sheaf of wheat or a cornucopia.
  • Interpretation: The orb in Ceres’s left hand aligns with her dominion over the earth and natural order, while the right hand, which holds symbols of fertility and nourishment, emphasizes her active role in life-giving and agricultural abundance. The orb might symbolize her cosmic connection to the fertility of the earth.

General Symbolism Behind the Left and Right Hands

  • Left Hand (Passive): In Roman iconography, the left hand is often used to symbolize the receptive, passive side of a deity, representing cosmic order, divine protection, and sovereignty over the universe. Holding the orb in the left hand suggests a cosmic or divine authority that is above the physical or military realm. It may also reflect the idea of cosmic dominion, where the goddess is viewed as a higher power who presides over the earthly realm.

  • Right Hand (Active): The right hand, conversely, is typically associated with action, authority, and active power. It is often depicted in gestures that involve military leadership, triumph, or domination. For goddesses like Victoria or Roma, who are associated with military or imperial success, the right hand holding a spear or palm branch reinforces their role as active participants in the military or imperial triumph.

We can therefore conclude the following:

  • The Left Hand: For most female deities associated with imperial power (such as Minerva, Victoria, Roma, and Ceres), the orb is typically held in the left hand, symbolizing their role in the cosmic and sovereign domain, over which they rule.
  • The Right Hand: The right hand often holds symbols that represent action, such as a spear or wreath, and signifies the deity’s role in military leadership, victory, and imperial sovereignty.

This careful positioning highlights the dual nature of these goddesses: they combine cosmic authority with active rule, protection, and imperial power. The orb in the left hand represents their divine legitimacy, while the right hand emphasizes their role in earthly governance and the protection of Roman imperial order.

Suggested Revised Translation

The inscription is dedicated to Brigantia, of the divine Emperors, and it focuses on the dedication of the statue. It should be interpreted as:

“To the goddess Brigantia, of the divine Emperors. Lucius Celer, Centurion, fulfilled his vow. Well-deserved.”

Breakdown of the Revised Interpretation

Brig(antiae Deae)”

  • This simply means “To the goddess Brigantia.”
  • It confirms that Brigantia is the central figure of the dedication and that the offering is made to her.

“Imp(eratoribus Divis)”

  • This refers to the “divine Emperors”. In Roman religious practice, this would typically indicate the deified emperors who were considered divine figures.
  • This doesn’t mean Brigantia is being deified alongside the emperors, but rather she is linked to them in her role as a protector of imperial authority and as part of the Romanized religious system. The wording connects her to the imperial cult and suggests that she shares in the divine protection of the empire, much like the emperors themselves.

“Votum Solvit”

  • This means “fulfilled his vow,” indicating that the centurion, Lucius Celer, has completed a vow (likely a religious or military vow), which typically involved dedicating an offering or statue to a deity in return for divine favor or protection. In this case, the vow is fulfilled in the form of a dedicated statue of Brigantia.

“L(ucius) Celer, Centurio”

  • This names the centurion (Lucius Celer) and his rank, emphasizing the military context of the dedication. This shows that the offering and dedication of the statue were directly related to the military and Roman soldiers’ religious practices, where they would offer votive dedications to the gods for their success and protection.

“Bene Merito”

This means “well-deserved,” affirming that the vow has been fulfilled properly, and likely that Brigantia, as a protector goddess, has provided the requested favour or protection.

Summary of the revised Interpretation

This inscription commemorates the dedication of a statue to Brigantia, associating her with the divine emperors—i.e., she is linked with the imperial cult and the imperial protection of the Roman Empire. The centurion Lucius Celer fulfilled a military vow by dedicating the statue, reinforcing Brigantia’s role as a protector of the Roman army and imperial authority.

I believe that the interpretation I’ve suggested is much more accurate in capturing the essence of the inscription. It highlights Brigantia’s status as a high-ranking Roman goddess, which, within Brigantia, we can now see clearer that there is indeed evidence to show this aspect of the inscription was never a mistake.

Conclusion: Brigantia’s Significance reinforced

Based on the various pieces of evidence we have explored, here’s a summary of the my proposal that an alternative interpretation of this important inscription holds a much stronger case for support that the current interpretation. The case for this can be summarised as follows:

  • Iconography: Brigantia’s depiction with imperial symbols like the sceptre and laurel wreath aligns her with high-ranking Roman deities.
  • Inscriptions: The use of “IMP” and “Augusta” in her inscriptions places Brigantia within the context of the imperial cult, suggesting that her role had been elevated to one of imperial significance.
  • Syncretism: The blending of Brigantia with multiple Roman deities, such as Victoria, Minerva, and Roma, indicates her transformation into a goddess who not only represented local Celtic identity but also Roman imperial power and divine authority.
  • The Orb: Her possible association with the orb reinforces the idea that Brigantia was positioned as a cosmic protector, similar to other top-tier deities like Juno or Minerva.

Confession time 🙂

You may have noticed, that whilst I stated that I wanted to build as strong a case as possible, that there is a lot of detail on the statue that I did not mention. Well, truth be told, I wanted to show you how much evidence there was. And how, actually, I was able to build a strong case by only looking at some of the evidence. It also made sense to try to about excessive verbiage caused by the need to include elements which, in the end were not need to in order to create a more safe interpretation of the evidence available.

But, now we have done all that, why not take a look at all the major features of the statue? Here is the official description:

“In high relief standing in a gabled niche. The goddess Brigantia is winged, has a Gorgon’s head on her breast, and wears a plumed helmet encircled by a turreted crown. In her right hand she holds a spear, in her left a globe; to her left stands her shield, to her right an omphaloid stone.”
ChatGPT said:

This detailed iconography significantly enhances our understanding of Brigantia’s elevated role in the Roman period, especially in relation to imperial power. Let’s break down the important elements of this statue and what they suggest about Brigantia IMP:

Winged Brigantia

Symbolism: The wings on Brigantia are a powerful symbol of divine power and speed, often indicating that the goddess is a figure who transcends earthly limitations. Wings are typically associated with deities of victory or those who represent military power (e.g., Victoria, the Roman goddess of victory, is often depicted with wings). In this case, the wings elevate Brigantia to the status of a divine protector, linking her to the imperial military and representing her role in ensuring the success of the Roman army.

Connection to Imperial Power: The wings also suggest that Brigantia is a transcendent and cosmic figure—one who is not only a protector of the local people but also a goddess associated with the entire empire, with the ability to oversee the Roman empire’s divine order.

The Gorgon’s Head on Her Breast

Symbolism: The Gorgon’s head (often associated with Medusa) is an ancient symbol of protection and warding off evil. It signifies power over adversaries and enemies. The Gorgon was frequently used in Roman iconography to symbolize divine protection against harm or military defeat.

Connection to Brigantia: The Gorgon’s head on Brigantia’s breast signifies that she has a role in protecting the empire—particularly through military victory. The presence of the Gorgon emphasizes her role as a protectress of the empire, particularly in its military endeavours.

The Plumed Helmet and Turreted Crown

Symbolism: The helmet and turreted crown reinforce Brigantia’s association with military power and sovereignty. The plumed helmet is a symbol of warrior status and military command. The turreted crown (a crown with turrets or fortifications) is a symbol of defence and fortress-like power. It often represents the protection of a city or empire, and the goddess’s dominion over it.

Connection to Brigantia: These elements signal that Brigantia is not just a local protector but is imperial in scope—a figure of defensive power who could be trusted to safeguard the Roman Empire and its military conquests. The turreted crown places her on a level comparable to Roman deities like Minerva or Victoria, both of whom were strongly connected to military success and protection.

The Spear in Her Right Hand

Symbolism: The spear is a classic symbol of military authority and victory. It directly associates Brigantia with military prowess, and its presence suggests that she is a goddess of military success. In Roman iconography, the spear often signifies active military power and defensive strength.

Connection to Brigantia: Holding the spear in her right hand, Brigantia embodies active power and control over military affairs. This reinforces her status as a warrior goddess and a military protector of the Roman empire.

The Globe in Her Left Hand

Symbolism: The globe represents sovereignty over the world and imperial dominion. In Roman iconography, the globe is often held by figures who symbolize cosmic rule or universal power. The left hand holding the globe may signify passive dominion or cosmic authority over the world, in contrast to the active military power of the spear in her right hand.

Connection to Brigantia: The globe in Brigantia’s left hand signifies that she not only holds earthly dominion (via her military protection) but also represents cosmic order and universal sovereignty. This elevates her to the rank of a cosmic protector, one who governs over the entire world, aligning her with the highest deities in the Roman pantheon, such as Juno or Minerva.

The Shield to Her Left

Symbolism: The shield represents defence and protection—it is a symbol of defensive strength, often associated with warrior deities and military leaders. In many depictions of Roman deities, the shield is used to signify their role as protectors of the empire and its people.

Connection to Brigantia: The shield suggests Brigantia’s defensive role, both as a protector of Roman soldiers and as a goddess of the empire’s security. This reinforces the idea that Brigantia is integrally connected to the defence of Roman power and military success, serving as a shielding force against both external and internal threats.

The Omphaloid Stone to Her Right

Symbolism: The omphaloid stone (often described as a navel-shaped stone) is an ancient symbol of the centre of the world, representing a point of divine origin or cosmic significance. It was often used to symbolize a link to the divine and the spiritual centre of the universe. The stone suggests a connection to the earth or the foundations of power.

Connection to Brigantia: The stone’s placement to Brigantia’s right emphasizes her role as a foundational figure—one who represents not just military defence but also divine authority rooted in the cosmic order. It connects her to the core of Roman power, suggesting she is at the centre of the empire’s spiritual and military strength.

Conclusion: The Elevated Status of Brigantia

The detailed description of Brigantia in high relief standing in a gabled niche conveys her elevated status in the Roman world, aligning her with some of the highest deities in the Roman pantheon. The combination of imperial symbols—the winged figure, Gorgon’s head, plumed helmet, turreted crown, spear, globe, shield, and omphaloid stone—places her at the centre of imperial power.

This depiction of Brigantia IMP is not only a goddess of victory and military protection, but also a cosmic ruler, embodying both earthly military dominion and universal sovereignty. She is equivalent to high-ranking deities like Victoria, Minerva, and even Juno in her role as a divine protector and emissary of imperial power. The imperial symbolism clearly positions Brigantia as a key figure within the Romanized religious system, possibly one of the highest-ranking deities in the Roman world.

Exploring Alternative Sources

To get a fuller view of the debate and symbology surrounding the Birrens statue and its inscription, you might find some alternative sources that directly address the iconography and visual culture of Roman Britain. These sources are likely to explore not only the inscription but also how local deities like Brigantia were represented visually, and how their iconography reflected Romanization. Here are a few suggestions:

  1. “Roman Britain: A New History” by Guy de la Bédoyère – This book provides a broader context of Roman Britain, exploring how Roman symbolism was applied to local deities, often using statues and artifacts to illustrate the fusion of Celtic and Roman culture. It might offer insight into how statues like Brigantia’s were reinterpreted to fit the imperial context.
  2. “The Art of Roman Britain” by Michael H. C. H. Williams – This source provides a more focused discussion on Roman art and iconography, including the use of imperial symbols in depictions of local gods. It might help explain how Brigantia’s Orb and laurel wreath fit within broader Roman visual traditions.
  3. “Roman Britain and the Roman Empire” by Peter Salway – This book discusses Roman Britain in both historical and cultural contexts, including the integration of local deities like Brigantia into Roman religious practices. Salway could provide an easier-to-understand framework for interpreting Brigantia’s iconography.
  4. “The Imperial Cult and the Roman Gods” by John Scheid – This work delves into how Roman deities were depicted with imperial symbols like the Orb, laurel wreath, and spear, and how these symbols reflected the imperial cult. The comparison with Brigantia would likely help bridge the gap between her local Celtic roots and her Romanized role.
  5. Clann Bhríde Additionally, the article “The Exalted Ones” provides insights into the syncretic nature of Brigantia’s depiction, highlighting her association with Roman symbols and deities.

Contact Us
close slider