Site Details:
















The purpose of the Dyke is not known. Possibly, it was a boundary, but if so, the effort involved in building it seems disproportionate. It may have been a defensive fortification. The date of the Dyke has not been determined, but it is almost certainly pre-Roman.
The outline of the Dyke can still be seen in some places, notably the eastern edge of Richmond (as shown below). Although much reduced in one or two places, the extent of the embankment of an earth and stone mound may still be seen. From the highest remaining point there is a commanding view eastwards and south-east to the North Yorkshire Moors and the Vale of York.
Easby Abbey
The relationship between Scott's Dyke and Easby Abbey is a subject of historical interest but remains speculative. Easby Abbey, founded in 1152, is a Premonstratensian monastery known for its well-preserved ruins and rare 13th-century wall paintings. The dyke predates the Abbey by several centuries, and there is no direct evidence to suggest a connection between the two. However, given their proximity, it is possible that the inhabitants of Easby Abbey were aware of the dyke and may have incorporated it into the landscape of the Abbey's extensive grounds. The dyke could have served as a boundary or marker for the Abbey's lands, or it may have been used in some capacity by the Abbey's community. The lack of concrete evidence means that any potential relationship between Scott's Dyke and Easby Abbey is a matter for conjecture, likely influenced by the changing landscape and social structures over the centuries. There is also the possibility, as seen elsewhere, that the site of Easby was chosen because it was a site of spiritual significance before the advent of Christianity in this area.Stanwick Iron Age Fort
It is interesting that the dyke itself does seem to reference that location. Stanwick Iron Age Fort While the precise relationship between these two significant earthworks remains a matter of conjecture, the temporal proximity of their origins suggests a potential complementary function. The Stanwick Fortifications, associated with the Brigantes tribe, represent the largest Iron Age fortifications in Britain, and their strategic importance is well-documented. The proximity of Scott's Dyke to these fortifications, as well as its formidable construction, has led some historians to propose that the dyke may have served as an additional defensive structure, perhaps delineating an outer boundary or serving as a barrier against incursions. The notion that Scott's Dyke was a military work rather than a mere boundary marker is supported by its scale and the effort required for its construction. Such an extensive earthwork would have required a significant mobilization of resources and labour, implying a purpose of considerable importance. The dyke's alignment with the natural landscape, utilizing rivers as natural barriers, further supports the theory of a defensive role. Moreover, the lack of artifacts or clear evidence linking the dyke to the nearby Roman road suggests that its origins are more deeply rooted in the pre-Roman era, possibly as an attempt to repel invasions or assert territorial control. While the absence of direct archaeological evidence precludes a definitive conclusion, the circumstantial evidence invites speculation that Scott's Dyke and the Stanwick Fortifications were part of a broader defensive network. This network may have been designed to protect the heartland of the Brigantes territory, with the dyke acting as a first line of defence, or as a demarcation of controlled lands.Site Gallery
Gallery Empty