Brough Law, Breamish Valley, Northumberland – Bronze Age Terracing

← Northumberland

Brough Law Bronze Age Terraces

Summary and supplemental information in relation to the publication: Early‐Middle Bronze-Age Agricultural Terraces in North-East England: Morphology, Dating & Cultural Implications. Download below:

Context & aims of the report

A multidisciplinary team re-examined a staircase of seven cultivation terraces on Ewe Hill, Breamish Valley (Cheviot Hills, Northumberland). Using high-resolution UAV Photogrammetry, geoarchaeology, portable OSL profiling, phytolith/pollen analysis and a new suite of radiocarbon assays (standard AMS + HyPy on pyrogenic carbon), the authors sought to pin down when the terraces were built and farmed, and how they fit into wider Bronze-Age land-use change.


Key findings on dating the terracing

Evidence line Result Chronological significance
Pre-terrace buried soils under T1 wall – two AMS/HyPy dates 5190 ± 70 BP (4011–3801 cal BC) and 5815 ± 25 BP (4777–4553 cal BC) Terminus-ante-quem: terrace construction must be after Late Mesolithic/Early Neolithic soils were sealed.
Basal fills behind terrace walls (T1 & T4) – four charcoal/HyPy dates Cluster between 1735–1507 cal BC Direct evidence for construction episode(s) in the Early Bronze Age.
Buried Ap/B horizons on tread surfaces Portable-OSL profiles show single “slow-accumulation” units immediately above construction horizon Supports Early Bronze-Age build followed by gradual soil accretion rather than multiple later rebuilds.
Barley grain from pit cut into T3 tread 1820 ± 40 BP (AD 168–338) Provides a latest-use marker (terraces pre-date but were still present/visible by Romano-British period).

Modelled chronology

  • Terrace staircase built c. 1890–1520 cal BC (95 % confidence) – probably 1860–1620 cal BC (68 % confidence).
  • Soil‐build-up and cultivation continued into the Middle Bronze Age (≤ c. 1400 cal BC).
  • By the time a trackway to the adjacent Roman Iron-Age enclosure was laid and a Romano-British pit dug, the terraces were already ancient earthworks, implying abandonment before the 2nd century AD.

Implications

  • Earliest securely dated cut-and-fill terraces in Britain – pushes intensive slope-modification for arable into the Early Bronze Age, aligning with wider evidence for a mid-second-millennium BC agricultural “take-off”.
  • Labour investment indicates either population pressure or elite-organised intensification in the Cheviots at that time.
  • Terraces were used for cereal cultivation (pollen & phytoliths show barley/wheat) in an already open landscape; stone revetments were augmented as ploughing mobilised colluvium.
  • Their abandonment may relate to later Bronze-Age climatic downturns, soil fatigue or social re-organisation, parallelling the cessation of high-altitude cultivation elsewhere (e.g. Dartmoor Reaves).

Construction of the Breamish terraces is firmly anchored to Early-to-Middle Bronze Age (∼ 1800–1500 BC) farming, making them a rare, well-dated example of prehistoric land-engineering in northern Britain and an important marker of Bronze-Age demographic and cultural change.

Other pre-Roman examples of landscape Terracing in England

Below are some of the best-documented examples of prehistoric (pre-Roman) agricultural or cultivation terraces in Britain, together with the dating evidence that links them to Bronze- or Iron-Age activity. They show that the Early–Middle Bronze-Age complex in the Breamish Valley is not an isolated case, although it remains the earliest securely dated cut-and-fill system so far.

Region / site Form of terracing Dating evidence & range Notes
Ewe Hill, Breamish Valley, Northumberland Seven stone-revetted cultivation terraces Radiocarbon & HyPy on buried soils and basal fills: c. 1860–1620 BC (build); cultivation to ≤ 1400 BC Earliest securely dated terraces in Britain; see Antiquity study (Cambridge University Press & Assessment)
Cheviot & Border Uplands (e.g. Hut Knowe, Snear Hill, Greenlee Lough) Broad lynchet-like terraces and narrow cord-rig ridged strips on slopes Cord-rig runs beneath Hadrian’s Wall (post-AD 122), proving a late Iron-Age or earlier date; South Shields excavation gave 3rd–4th century BC dates for rig under the Roman fort (Oxford Reference, ResearchGate) Cord-rig often merges with larger lynchets; extensive systems mapped by LiDAR across the Cheviots (Research Frameworks)
Plumpton Plain field system, South Downs, East Sussex Multi-row lynchet terraces, embanked enclosures & terraced trackways Field investigation and Beaker/Late-Bronze-Age pottery suggest c. 2500–900 BC for initial laying-out; Historic England survey summarises evidence (Historic England, The Times) One of the best-preserved chalk-downland lynchet complexes; comparable to nearby Itford Hill
Itford Hill & “Itford-Hill–style” settlements, South Downs Terraced enclosures & lynchet fields on spurs Classic excavation (Burstow & Holleyman 1957) placed construction in the Late Bronze Age (c. 1000–800 BC); remains cited in recent South-East research agenda (Wikipedia, Kent County Council) Typologically similar complexes occur along the Sussex Downs (e.g. Black Patch)
Dartmoor Reaves (Devon) Extensive coaxial field systems; lynchet scarps form on steeper slopes Stone reave walls date to the Middle–Late Bronze Age (c. 1700–1200 BC); lynchet formation subsequent to ploughing against reaves (Fleming 1988)(Wikipedia) Terracing is incidental to wall-building but creates clear tread/risers on many valley sides
Terraced track & fields, Chalton Down, Hampshire Low lynchets flanking a terraced droveway Associated pottery & enclosure features indicate a Middle–Late Bronze-Age date (Academia)
Berkshire Downs lynchets (Lambourn area) Massive chalk lynchets Early excavators suggested c. 1000 BC, but 1990 re-assessment favoured Romano-British origins for many; highlights dating difficulties and need for direct assays (Penn Museum)

What the corpus shows

  • Terracing is widespread but unevenly dated. Long-known lynchet systems on chalk and Limestone (South Downs, Berkshire Downs, Wessex) were traditionally ascribed to “Celtic” Iron-Age farmers; only targeted excavation or new techniques (e.g. HyPy radiocarbon, OSL) can separate true prehistoric examples from later Medieval or Roman cultivation scarps.
  • Techniques vary with geology and society.
    • Stone-reverted cut-and-fill terraces (Breamish) required heavy labour investment—hinting at communal or elite-directed projects early in the 2nd millennium BC.
    • Cord-rig and simple lynchets in the Border Uplands and Dartmoor show lighter engineering but equally early adoption, often linked to upland spade-cultivation or clearance for cereal plots.
  • Many prehistoric terraces continued to be visible (and sometimes reused) into the Roman or Medieval period, explaining why later artefacts sometimes sit in terrace–tread soils while the construction horizon remains Bronze-Age.
  • Dating still relies on opportunistic exposures. Secure chronologies come where terrace risers seal buried soils, or where structures (Hadrian’s Wall, hillfort ditches) provide stratigraphic brackets. Systematic coring, OSL profiling and Bayesian radiocarbon modelling—as used at Ewe Hill—are beginning to refine the timeline.

Beyond the newly dated Cheviot example, a cluster of terraced field systems and cord-rig complexes across southern England, the Cheviots/Borders and Dartmoor can confidently be assigned to Bronze- or Iron-Age cultivation. The picture is still patchy, but accumulating evidence shows that large-scale slope modification for agriculture was part of Britain’s prehistoric landscape centuries before Roman influence arrived.

Site Gallery

Leave a Reply

Your e-mail address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Contact Us
close slider